200- to 300-word summary of a current issue between Native Americans and the federal government. Identify the legislation that you think is linked to the issue, and explain why you think there is a connection
Please tell us what you've learned from the suggestions for research that you received in this class. We'll be glad to help you after you've exhausted these resources.
http://www.jiskha.com/display.cgi?id=1213407840
One current issue between Native Americans and the federal government involves the protection of sacred sites and natural resources on tribal lands. The connection between this issue and the federal government can be traced back to a legislation known as the Indian Religious Freedom Act (IRFA) of 1978.
Native American tribes consider certain areas on their lands to be sacred, holding deep spiritual and cultural significance. However, over the years, these areas have been threatened due to various factors such as resource extraction, land development, and lack of recognition of tribal sovereignty. This has created tensions between tribes and the federal government, as tribes advocate for the protection and preservation of their sacred sites.
The IRFA was established to address the religious freedom rights of Native Americans and protect their access to sacred sites. It aims to guarantee their ability to practice their religious beliefs, including rites, ceremonies, and rituals, without governmental interference. However, implementation and enforcement of the IRFA have been inconsistent, leading to continued conflicts.
The connection between the issue of sacred sites and the federal government is evident through the federal agencies responsible for overseeing tribal relations and land management. The Bureau of Indian Affairs (BIA) and the Department of the Interior (DOI) play crucial roles in enforcing regulations related to tribal lands and resources. The federal government's decisions on permits, leases, and land-use policies can significantly impact the preservation or destruction of Native American sacred sites.
Additionally, past and present federal legislation, such as the General Mining Law of 1872 and the Indian Removal Act of 1830, have directly affected Native American lands and resources, leading to the erosion of tribal sovereignty. These historical policies and current regulatory frameworks contribute to the struggles faced by Native American tribes when asserting their rights to protect their sacred sites.
In conclusion, the ongoing issue between Native Americans and the federal government regarding sacred sites and natural resources stems from the historical and current legislation that has shaped tribal land management and sovereignty. The IRFA acts as a connection point, as it addresses the religious freedom rights of Native Americans, thereby highlighting the significance of their sacred sites. The proper implementation and enforcement of this legislation, alongside a comprehensive acknowledgment of tribal sovereignty, are crucial steps towards resolving this issue and ensuring the protection of Native American cultural heritage.