Robinson argues that integrity should be regarded as:
To know how Robinson argues that integrity should be regarded as, we might need more context or information about Robinson and their views. Nevertheless, I can provide a general explanation of how to analyze an argument.
1. Identify the source: Determine who Robinson is, such as a philosopher, author, or public figure. Consider their background, expertise, or any specific work they have produced on the topic of integrity.
2. Gather information: Search for relevant articles, books, or interviews by Robinson to understand their perspective fully. Look for any specific statements or arguments made by Robinson about how integrity should be regarded.
3. Evaluate the argument: Analyze Robinson's reasoning and evidence to support their claim. Look for logical consistency, coherence, and any underlying assumptions. Assess whether the argument is persuasive and supported by reliable evidence.
4. Consider counterarguments: Explore alternative perspectives or criticism of Robinson's argument. Look for different viewpoints to gain a comprehensive understanding of the topic.
5. Formulate conclusions: Based on the gathered information and evaluation, draw conclusions about how Robinson argues that integrity should be regarded. Summarize their main points, the evidence they provide, and any potential implications or implications of their argument.
Remember that without specific information about Robinson's argument, it is challenging to provide a more detailed explanation.