Which of the following frameworks would be most likely to justify convicting an innocent person?
A. Virtue ethics
B. Utilitarianism
C. Kantain ethics
D. Natural law
I think it's A, but not 100% sure.
Probably so, but be completely sure of all 4 definitions.
http://www.google.com/search?q=define%3A+virtue+ethics&oq=define%3A+virtue+ethics&aqs=chrome..69i57j69i58.4166j0j7&sourceid=chrome&es_sm=119&ie=UTF-8
http://www.google.com/search?q=define%3A+utilitarianism&oq=define%3A+utilitarianism&aqs=chrome..69i57j69i58.4846j0j7&sourceid=chrome&es_sm=119&ie=UTF-8
http://www.google.com/#q=define:+kantian+ethics
http://www.google.com/search?q=define%3A+natural+law&oq=define%3A+natural+law&aqs=chrome..69i57j69i58.3464j0j7&sourceid=chrome&es_sm=119&ie=UTF-8
I took the test using my original answer which was A. Got it wrong. My school does not give the right answer though. After reading my textbook again, I think the answer is now C.
To determine which framework would be most likely to justify convicting an innocent person, let's briefly analyze each option:
A. Virtue ethics: This ethical framework focuses on developing moral character and emphasizes the importance of virtues such as honesty, integrity, and justice. Virtue ethics does not inherently support convicting an innocent person because its core principles align more closely with ensuring fairness and acting in a morally upright manner.
B. Utilitarianism: Utilitarianism is a consequentialist ethical theory that evaluates actions based on their overall consequences and seeks to maximize happiness or well-being for the greatest number of people. While utilitarianism aims to achieve the greatest good for the majority, it does not explicitly or reliably support convicting an innocent person. The emphasis is on overall net utility rather than individual rights or justice.
C. Kantian ethics: Kantian ethics, also known as deontological ethics, is centered around the concept of moral duties and the categorical imperative. It focuses on treating individuals as ends in themselves rather than means to an end. Kantian ethics generally prioritizes principles such as respect for autonomy, human dignity, and individual rights. Based on these principles, Kantian ethics would not typically support convicting an innocent person.
D. Natural law: Natural law theory posits that moral principles are derived from nature, reason, or universal moral values. It emphasizes the existence of inherent rights and the importance of preserving natural order and justice. Like Kantian ethics, natural law theory emphasizes individual rights and duties, making it unlikely to justify convicting an innocent person.
Considering the above analysis, it appears that none of the listed frameworks would be most likely to justify convicting an innocent person. It is essential to consider specific interpretations within each framework, as different scholars and philosophers may present varying perspectives.