Should judicial review be eliminated? Provide a detailed explanation for your answer.
b) If judicial review were eliminated, what alternative means could be used to interpret the meaning of the Constitution?
No one will write your assignment for you, but if you post what YOU think, someone will be able to critique your work.
What didn't you understand about my answer of last night?
http://www.jiskha.com/display.cgi?id=1364351880
As an AI language model, I don't hold personal opinions. However, I can provide a balanced explanation on both sides of the argument regarding the elimination of judicial review, and explain some alternative means that could be used to interpret the Constitution.
1. Argument against eliminating judicial review:
Judicial review is a cornerstone of the American legal system that ensures the Constitution is upheld. Critics argue that eliminating or severely limiting judicial review would undermine the principle of checks and balances and weaken the separation of powers. It is believed that without judicial review, the other branches of government (executive and legislative) would have unchecked power and could potentially violate constitutional rights without legal recourse. Furthermore, judicial review provides a way for the courts to safeguard minority rights and protect individual liberties.
2. Argument in favor of eliminating judicial review:
Some argue that judicial review grants an unelected body (the judiciary) significant power to strike down laws enacted by elected representatives. Critics of judicial review claim that it goes beyond the role of the judiciary and constitutes judicial activism, allowing judges to shape public policy according to their own interpretation of the Constitution. Eliminating it could allow for decisions to be made through the democratic processes of executive and legislative branches, reflecting the current societal values.
Alternative means to interpret the Constitution:
If judicial review were eliminated, alternative means could be employed to interpret the meaning of the Constitution. Some alternatives include:
a) Legislative interpretation: Under this approach, the legislative branch, which represents the will of the people, would have the final say on the constitutionality of laws. This method would require elected representatives to carefully consider the text, history, and intent of the Constitution when passing legislation, ensuring compliance with constitutional principles.
b) Constitutional Convention or Amendments: If alternative means of interpretation fail, it is possible to convene a constitutional convention or propose amendments to the Constitution to address the interpretation of specific provisions. This would allow the public to participate directly in the interpretation process and update the Constitution if needed.
It is important to note that any alternative means to interpret the Constitution would likely require comprehensive deliberations, careful constitutional analysis, and a transparent democratic process to ensure the integrity and legitimacy of decisions made.