What are the implications of NCLB on teachers; on students in the classroom; and on schools and school districts?

I went to www.google.com and entered nclb effects and here are the results:

http://www.google.com/search?q=nclb+effects&rls=com.microsoft:en-us:IE-SearchBox&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&sourceid=ie7&rlz=1I7SUNA

You should find plenty of information and opinion in there -- pro and con.

=)

"No Children Left Behind" ?

The final returns aren't in yet. It always seemed to me to be a campaign slogan to gain votes and cut education budgets.

Here is a recent response to that question, which I consider objective:

http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=5134827

The No Child Left Behind (NCLB) Act had significant implications for teachers, students, schools, and school districts. Let's explore each of these impacts in more detail:

1. Implications for Teachers:
NCLB imposed rigorous accountability measures on teachers. It required them to demonstrate student progress in specific areas, as determined by standardized tests. Teachers faced pressure to meet academic targets, and their evaluations often depended on student test scores. This resulted in classrooms sometimes becoming test-focused, with teachers dedicating more time to test preparation and teaching to the test.

2. Implications for Students in the Classroom:
NCLB had both positive and negative impacts on students. On one hand, the act aimed to ensure that all students received a high-quality education by setting rigorous standards. It highlighted the importance of improving student performance and addressing achievement gaps. On the other hand, the emphasis on standardized testing could sometimes lead to teaching styles that focused solely on test preparation, reducing overall student engagement and creativity in the classroom.

3. Implications for Schools and School Districts:
NCLB placed a significant burden on schools and districts to meet federal education standards. Schools that consistently did not meet Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) faced consequences such as restructuring, staff changes, or even closure. This put pressure on administrators and district officials to closely monitor student progress and implement intervention strategies when needed. Furthermore, NCLB required schools to provide parents with annual reports on their children's performance, ensuring transparency but also adding administrative responsibilities.

To fully understand the implications of NCLB on teachers, students, schools, and school districts, further research and analysis can be done by examining studies and reports on the topic.