He claimed that wrong information given by Tommy was received to mislead him to make a wrong amendment.
It was the only transaction amended from Tommy to Jimmy in April.
He claimed that wrong information given by Tommy was received to mislead him to make a wrong amendment.
It was the only transaction amended from Tommy to Jimmy in April.
Pls comment if it is correct in grammar ... thanks.
Neither sentence is clear in meaning.
He claimed that wrong information given by Tommy was received to mislead him to make a wrong amendment.
He claimed that Tommy gave him the wrong information, which led him to make a wrong decision.
It was the only transaction amended from Tommy to Jimmy in April.
It was the only transaction between Tommy and Jimmy in April.
The word "amendment" as you've used it in these two sentences doesn't make sense, so I removed it.
To verify the claim made, we can follow a step-by-step process:
1. Obtain the transaction records: Obtain the records of all transactions made by Tommy and Jimmy in April. These records should include details such as the date, description, amount, and any amendments made.
2. Identify the transaction in question: Look through the transaction records and find the specific transaction that was amended from Tommy to Jimmy. Take note of its details, including the original transaction information and the amendments made.
3. Review the initial information: Examine the initial information given by Tommy for this transaction. This may include documents, emails, or any other form of communication regarding the transaction. Check if these details align with the original transaction information recorded.
4. Analyze the amendments: Carefully analyze the amendments made to the transaction. Look for any discrepancies or inconsistencies in the amended information that could indicate that it was intentionally manipulated to mislead Jimmy.
5. Consider motives and evidence: Assess the motives behind the claim. Is there any evidence or indication that suggests Tommy had the intention to mislead Jimmy? Gather any additional information or statements from both parties that may shed light on the situation.
6. Evaluate the overall situation: Based on the findings from steps 1 to 5, evaluate the credibility of the claim. Determine if there is sufficient evidence to support the assertion that Tommy provided wrong information intentionally to mislead Jimmy.
By going through this process, you can gather and analyze the necessary information to assess the validity of the claim that wrong information given by Tommy was received to mislead Jimmy in making a wrong amendment.