# Philosophy Logic

posted by .

Use the 17 rules of inference to prove the following arguments valid?
1)(Z>X).(X>~Z)
2)Z v X
3)~X/A.B

## Similar Questions

1. ### Logic

Having problems with solving this question. The directions are: Use the 18 rules of inference, supply a proof. 1.(RvX)>(A>B) 2.~Q>~C 3.~C>Z 4.R.Y 5.QvA The conclusion I'm supposed to arrive at is /ZvB
2. ### Analyzing arguments

What is the difference between an unsound argument and an invalid argument?
3. ### Philosophy

What is the meaning of validity, truth, and soundness as they relate to the area of logical syllogisms?
4. ### Philosophy

a) Using long or short truth tables (symbolize as necessary and show tables) determine and state whether the following arguments are valid, briefly explaining your table; and b) if valid, demonstrate validity by deductions using Group …
5. ### Philosophy

a) Using long or short truth tables (symbolize as necessary and show tables) determine and state whether the following arguments are valid, briefly explaining your table; and b) if valid, demonstrate validity by deductions using Group …
6. ### Logic

Using the law of inference, prove if the below argument is valid. (P1) R -> B (P2) D V R (P3) B /D You may imply all rules of inference to figure out if it is valid.
7. ### Logic

Supply steps in a proof of a valid argument and give reasons using rules of inference. 1.)~A*B 2.)C>A 3.)CvD/D
8. ### Logic

Need help supplying proo f for the following problem using the rules of inference 1. (Z.Y)> X 2. ~O>Z 3. ~Y>O 4. ~O.T /S
9. ### logic

I need help proving these arguments using rules of inference, please. (S>B) > (SvK) (Kv~D) ~ (H>S) ~S.W / ~H ~A > (B>~C) ~D > (~C >A) D v ~A ~D