Philosophy Logic
posted by Chris .
Use the 17 rules of inference to prove the following arguments valid?
1)(Z>X).(X>~Z)
2)Z v X
3)~X/A.B
Respond to this Question
Similar Questions

Logic
Having problems with solving this question. The directions are: Use the 18 rules of inference, supply a proof. 1.(RvX)>(A>B) 2.~Q>~C 3.~C>Z 4.R.Y 5.QvA The conclusion I'm supposed to arrive at is /ZvB 
Analyzing arguments
What is the difference between an unsound argument and an invalid argument? 
Philosophy
What is the meaning of validity, truth, and soundness as they relate to the area of logical syllogisms? 
Philosophy
a) Using long or short truth tables (symbolize as necessary and show tables) determine and state whether the following arguments are valid, briefly explaining your table; and b) if valid, demonstrate validity by deductions using Group … 
Philosophy
a) Using long or short truth tables (symbolize as necessary and show tables) determine and state whether the following arguments are valid, briefly explaining your table; and b) if valid, demonstrate validity by deductions using Group … 
Logic
Using the law of inference, prove if the below argument is valid. (P1) R > B (P2) D V R (P3) B /D You may imply all rules of inference to figure out if it is valid. 
Logic
Supply steps in a proof of a valid argument and give reasons using rules of inference. 1.)~A*B 2.)C>A 3.)CvD/D 
Logic
Need help supplying proo f for the following problem using the rules of inference 1. (Z.Y)> X 2. ~O>Z 3. ~Y>O 4. ~O.T /S 
logic
I need help proving these arguments using rules of inference, please. (S>B) > (SvK) (Kv~D) ~ (H>S) ~S.W / ~H ~A > (B>~C) ~D > (~C >A) D v ~A ~D 
Logic
Can someone please help me solve these problems?