Philosophy
posted by Anne .
a) Using long or short truth tables (symbolize as necessary and show tables) determine and state whether the following argument is valid, briefly explaining your table; and b) if valid, demonstrate validity by deductions using Group I rules.
Arg
If Peter is perceptive, then Quincy is a quack. Quincy, however, is not a quack. So Peter's not perceptive. (Hint: this is a valid argument)
Respond to this Question
Similar Questions

Philosophy
a) Using long or short truth tables (symbolize as necessary and show tables) determine and state whether the following arguments are valid, briefly explaining your table; and b) if valid, demonstrate validity by deductions using Group … 
Philosophy
a) Using long or short truth tables (symbolize as necessary and show tables) determine and state whether the following arguments are valid, briefly explaining your table; and b) if valid, demonstrate validity by deductions using Group … 
Phil103 Informal Logic
. If P is false, and Q is false, the truthvalue of "P ¡êQ" is (Points : 1) false. true. Cannot be determined. All of the above. 2. What is the truth value of the sentence "P & ~ P"? 
Logic
The sentence "P → Q" is read as (3) P or Q P and Q If P then Q Q if and only P 2. In the truth table for an invalid argument, (2) on at least one row, where the premises are all true, the conclusion is true. on at least one row, … 
Informal LogicPls chk ans
The sentence "P → Q" is read as (3) P or Q P and Q If P then Q Q if and only P 2. In the truth table for an invalid argument, (2) on at least one row, where the premises are all true, the conclusion is true. on at least one row, … 
philosophy
Truth tables can determine which of the following? 
phi103
1. A conditional sentence with a false antecedent is always (Points : 1) true. false. Cannot be determined. not a sentence. 2. "Julie and Kurt got married and had a baby" is best symbolized as (Points : 1) M v B M & B M → B M … 
Logic
Truth tables can determine which of the following? 
math for liberal arts
construct a truth table to determine whether each argument is valid. Be sure to state whether it is valid or invalid with each question. 1) ~p v q p ____ triangle of dots p^~q 
Descrete maths
Show that the following conditional statement is a tautology without using truth tables.[ p ^ ( p ! q )] ! q 8. Without the use of truth tables, determine whether ( : p ^ ( p ! q )) !: q is a tautology. show all your work