In research, several principles have been shown to affect the strength of association between stimuli. Based on your own experiences in learning, provide an example of each of the following principles of association: contiguity, frequency, and intensity. Select one of your examples. Describe how a different principle of association might explain this example.
Your initial post should be a minimum of 250-300 words.
How would you like us to help you with this assignment?
How can we know "your own experiences in learning"?
Principles of association play a crucial role in the process of learning and how individuals form connections between stimuli. Three well-known principles of association are contiguity, frequency, and intensity. In this response, I will provide an example for each principle and explain how a different principle of association might explain that example.
The principle of contiguity suggests that stimuli in close proximity to each other in space and time are likely to be associated. For example, imagine you are studying for a math exam, and you consistently listen to a specific type of music while solving practice problems. Over time, the association between the music and math problems will strengthen due to the contiguity principle. Eventually, when you hear that specific type of music, it may serve as a cue and activate your memory of math problems, improving your recall. Contiguity is what establishes the connection between the music and math problems.
The principle of frequency states that more frequent pairings of stimuli lead to stronger associations. Let's consider a different example. Suppose you are trying to learn a foreign language. If you frequently immerse yourself in an environment where that language is spoken, such as by watching TV shows, listening to podcasts, and conversing with native speakers, it is likely that your language learning will progress faster. The principle of frequency plays a role here, as the more you expose yourself to the language, the stronger the association between the language and its meaning becomes.
Lastly, the intensity principle suggests that strong or emotionally charged stimuli are more likely to be associated. To illustrate this principle, imagine you are preparing for a presentation, and during one particular rehearsal, you accidentally trip and fall on stage. The embarrassment and humiliation you experienced in that moment create a strong emotional response. As a result, the association between the stage and negative emotions will be reinforced. Even in future presentations, the presence of the stage may trigger feelings of anxiety and fear due to the intense emotional experience associated with it.
Now, let's consider how a different principle of association might explain the math example provided earlier, which relied on the principle of contiguity. The principle of frequency could also explain this example. If you consistently listen to the same type of music while solving math problems over a long period, the frequency of pairings between the music and math problems would increase. The repeated exposure to both stimuli would strengthen the association between them, leading to improved recall whenever you hear that music. In this scenario, the principle of frequency would emphasize the importance of repeated pairings in forming strong associations.
In conclusion, the principles of association, including contiguity, frequency, and intensity, shape how individuals form connections between stimuli and learn from their experiences. By considering examples that reflect these principles, such as studying with music, immersing in a foreign language, or experiencing an emotionally charged event, we can better understand how the principles of association influence the strength of associations. Additionally, exploring how a different principle of association might explain a given example helps deepen our understanding of the complex nature of learning and memory.