Would the subject of gaming(such as casinos) be a current issue between Native Americans and the federal government?
Yes.
Check these sites.
(Broken Link Removed)
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&ie=ISO-8859-1&q=Indian+casinos+U.S.+government
researching bilingualism in education and politics in the United States find Also find 4 website to support you ariticle
Yes, the subject of gaming, specifically casinos operated by Native American tribes, has been a contentious issue between Native Americans and the federal government in the United States. To understand this issue better, we can study the history and current status of Native American gaming and its relationship with the federal government.
1. Background: The Indian Gaming Regulatory Act (IGRA) of 1988:
In the United States, the federal government has a unique relationship with Native American tribes due to historical treaties and sovereignty. In 1988, the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act (IGRA) was passed by the U.S. Congress, which provided a legal framework for Native American tribes to operate casinos on their reservations.
2. Tribal Sovereignty vs. Federal Regulation:
IGRA allows Native American tribes to establish and operate casinos, but under certain conditions and regulations imposed by the federal government. The law aims to balance tribal sovereignty with the need for effective regulation. The tribes can generate revenue, create jobs, and promote economic development through gaming, while the federal government ensures oversight and safeguards against potential issues.
3. Challenges and Disputes:
Despite the regulations put in place, conflicts and challenges between Native American tribes and the federal government regarding gaming have emerged. Some common issues include:
a. Land and Jurisdiction: Concerns arise when determining the boundaries of reservation land, especially in cases where tribes want to expand gaming activities beyond their existing reservations.
b. Revenue Sharing: Revenue generated by Native American casinos can be significant, and questions arise regarding how these funds are distributed. Some tribes face disputes surrounding the sharing of casino profits with state governments.
c. Regulation and Oversight: The federal government and tribes sometimes have differing perspectives on the level of regulation required. Disputes can arise when it comes to issues such as licensing, environmental impact, and labor laws.
d. Competition and Conflict: The establishment of casinos on tribal land can lead to competition with non-Native American gaming establishments. This can result in legal battles, lobbying efforts, and conflicts between tribes and non-tribal gaming operators.
4. Ongoing Negotiations and Litigation:
Native American tribes and the federal government continue to navigate these issues through negotiations, litigation, and revisions to tribal-state compacts. The nature of these disputes varies across different states and tribal jurisdictions.
To stay updated on the specific current issues between Native Americans and the federal government regarding gaming, it is recommended to follow reliable news sources, legal journals, and resources focused on Native American affairs. These sources will provide you with the latest developments, legal disputes, and ongoing negotiations between the tribes and the federal government.