when middle-class mainstream teachers reprimand children for verbalizing spontaneouly, they show a preference for facilitaing language development through what?
What are your choices? What is your answer?
stories and accounts
When middle-class mainstream teachers reprimand children for verbalizing spontaneously, they show a preference for facilitating language development through structured and controlled interactions.
To understand this, let's break down the question and explore the possible reasons behind such preferences:
1. Middle-class mainstream teachers: It seems the question refers to teachers who belong to the middle-class and teach in mainstream educational settings.
2. Reprimanding children for verbalizing spontaneously: This suggests that when children speak out spontaneously, these teachers reprimand or discourage them.
3. Preference for facilitating language development: Despite the reprimanding, it appears that teachers still focus on promoting language development in some way.
4. Through what? The question asks about the specific method or approach these teachers employ to facilitate language development.
In mainstream educational settings, teachers often emphasize structured and controlled interactions to facilitate language development. This means that they prefer organized and planned activities, where students follow set rules, take turns, and conform to expected behavior. Such structured interactions allow teachers to guide language development in a controlled manner. This includes activities like group discussions, scripted dialogues, role-playing exercises, or guided question-answer sessions.
By enforcing rules and expectations, these teachers aim to provide a more focused and predictable language learning environment. They believe that by moderating students' spontaneous verbalizations, they can ensure a clearer and more purposeful language development process. However, it is important to note that this approach may differ across different educational contexts and may not be universally adopted by all teachers.
It is also essential to consider that there are alternative methods and approaches to language development, such as promoting spontaneity, creativity, and free expression. These approaches may be more prevalent in different educational philosophies or specific teaching methodologies.