One more question:

Why did the Progressive movement want the direct election of senators?

Senators elected indirectly made little effort to represent the people.

Progressives believed that having representatives elected by state legislatures was sufficient.

Progressives believed that direct election of senators gave more control of government to the people.

Progressives wanted to eliminate the Electoral College in all elections except presidential ones.

Thanks!

I think maybe Progressives believed that direct election of senators gave more control of government to the people?

The Progressive movement in the United States advocated for various political and social reforms during the late 19th and early 20th centuries. One of the key objectives of the Progressive movement was to increase the influence of ordinary citizens in politics and reduce the power of political machines and special interests. As such, they supported the direct election of senators.

Previously, prior to the ratification of the 17th Amendment in 1913, senators were chosen by state legislatures rather than through direct popular vote. This indirect method of selection allowed for corruption and political maneuvering, often resulting in senators who did not effectively represent the interests and needs of the people. Progressive reformers believed that senators elected indirectly had little incentive to listen to their constituents as they were beholden to state legislatures and other political insiders.

By advocating for the direct election of senators, Progressives aimed to democratize the political process and empower the electorate. They believed that allowing voters themselves to choose senators would result in elected officials who were more accountable to the people. Direct election of senators was seen as a way to give ordinary citizens a greater say in government decision-making and reduce the influence of political elites.

In summary, the Progressive movement wanted the direct election of senators because they believed it would lead to a more representative and accountable government, with elected officials who were responsive to the needs and desires of the people.

I agree. :-)

What do you think?