A job application letter is effective in convincing the reader that an applicant is knowledgeable of the company by?
a.)providing relevant evidence from what the applicant has done in the past to support claims that this person can do the job.
b.)presenting information about the company as if it will be news to the reader.
c.)discussing 10 to 12 specific details to demonstrate the applicant's knowledge.
d.)making the job application letter general enough so that it can be sent to a number of different companies.
i am confused between A or C
To determine which option is correct, let's break down each option and see which one best demonstrates knowledge about the company:
a) Providing relevant evidence from past accomplishments: This option suggests that the applicant supports their claims of being capable of doing the job by providing evidence from their past experiences. By doing so, it showcases the applicant's knowledge of the company and its requirements.
c) Discussing 10 to 12 specific details: This option suggests that the applicant includes a significant number of specific details to demonstrate their knowledge about the company. While this can be effective in highlighting their familiarity, it does not necessarily guarantee a better understanding of the company compared to option a.
Given the options, option a) is more likely to convince the reader about the applicant's knowledge of the company. By providing relevant evidence from their past experiences, the applicant not only demonstrates their skills but also shows that they have done their research and understand what the company is looking for in a candidate. This approach is more personalized and specific, making it a stronger choice for convincing the reader.