The current threat of terrorism has made many legislatures in Congress think about the United States combining all the police agencies into one national police organization. The centralization of power would stop the discombobulated nature of the 3 government levels of police and provide a clear, overall standard on how to police not only terrorism acts but crime in general.
Please answer the following questions. As you answer each question you must provide support or evidence that will enhance and empirically prove your answers. Academic criminal justice articles or real-life criminal justice findings that are not found in journals or other academic sources must be used in supporting your answers. Please use APA style for all cited sources including your resource page.
•Should the United States combine all the police agencies into one national police organization? Why or why not?
•If you must consolidate the police, would you have to do the same to the criminal justice system? How would you create and establish such a police organization?
•Do you believe that the establishment of terrorism as a crime that can be committed domestically has changed community policing? How? Why? Provide examples.
How would you like us to help you with this assignment?
do it for her.
As an AI language model, I don't have access to real-time data or the ability to search academic articles. However, I can provide you with a framework to help you answer the questions based on academic principles and general knowledge about policing and the criminal justice system.
1. Should the United States combine all the police agencies into one national police organization? Why or why not?
Answer: This question addresses the concept of centralizing power by combining all police agencies into a single national organization. The decision to centralize police agencies involves various considerations, including efficiency, coordination, accountability, and the ability to respond effectively to terrorism and crime.
One argument for centralization is that it may lead to more efficient use of resources, eliminating redundancies, and increasing coordination among agencies. Proponents suggest that this would result in a clear overall standard for policing, facilitating the ability to combat terrorism acts and general crime.
On the other hand, critics argue that a centralized national police organization could lead to a concentration of power and potentially compromise local autonomy and community-oriented policing strategies. Furthermore, decentralization can allow for flexibility in addressing unique regional and local needs.
To further explore the pros and cons of centralization, you can consult relevant academic research articles in criminal justice or government publications. These sources should provide empirical evidence, case studies, and expert opinions to support and enhance your analysis.
2. If you must consolidate the police, would you have to do the same to the criminal justice system? How would you create and establish such a police organization?
Answer: Consolidating police agencies would have implications for the broader criminal justice system. If the decision to create a national police organization is made, it would likely require aligning or restructuring other components of the criminal justice system to ensure effectiveness and efficiency.
Creating a national police organization would involve several steps:
a. Legislative and policy changes: Laws and policies must be established or amended to provide the legal framework for the new organization. These changes would address issues such as jurisdiction, organizational structure, accountability mechanisms, and relationships with other criminal justice entities.
b. Organizational structure: A new administrative structure would need to be designed to accommodate the merging of multiple agencies. The structure should consider factors such as command hierarchy, staffing levels, training requirements, and resource allocation.
c. Personnel considerations: Human resource management would play a crucial role in establishing a national police organization. Considerations would include recruitment processes, training standards, deployment strategies, and career development pathways for personnel from diverse backgrounds.
d. Technological integration: Consolidating multiple agencies would require integrating various information systems, databases, and technologies to enable seamless communication and information sharing between departments.
To explore the creation and establishment of a police organization in more detail, you can review case studies, government reports, or academic sources that discuss the processes and challenges of merging or centralizing police agencies.
3. Do you believe that the establishment of terrorism as a crime that can be committed domestically has changed community policing? How? Why? Provide examples.
Answer: The establishment of terrorism as a crime that can be committed domestically has had an impact on community policing approaches. Community policing focuses on building trust and partnerships between law enforcement agencies and the communities they serve, with an emphasis on proactive problem-solving and community engagement.
Due to the evolving nature of terrorism threats, community policing has had to adapt and incorporate additional dimensions, such as:
a. Intelligence sharing and collaboration: Community policing strategies have increasingly emphasized information sharing between law enforcement agencies and community members to identify potential threats or suspicious activities related to terrorism.
b. Outreach and awareness programs: Police departments have engaged in outreach efforts to educate communities about terrorism threats, provide guidance on reporting suspicious activities, and promote community resilience.
c. Enhanced community involvement: Community policing now emphasizes the importance of community members as active participants in preventing and detecting terrorism. Neighborhood watch programs, community resilience initiatives, and community-led response strategies have gained prominence.
d. Bridging cultural divides: Community policing recognizes the need for improved cultural competency to build relationships with diverse communities. This includes fostering understanding, trust, and cooperation while combating potential stereotypes and biases.
To support these claims and provide examples, you can refer to scholarly articles, case studies, or reports that examine the impact of terrorism on community policing strategies, successful engagement initiatives, or community-led counterterrorism efforts.
Remember to use APA style when citing any references you incorporate into your responses.