How can a person distinguish between the prejudicial and nonprejudicial use of rhetorical devices?
Here are previous answers to this question that I obtained via Google under the key words "'rhetorical devices' prejudice" to get these possible sources:
http://www.jiskha.com/search/search.cgi?query=rhetorical+device
In the future, you can find the information you desire more quickly, if you use appropriate key words to do your own search. Also see http://hanlib.sou.edu/searchtools/.
I hope this helps. Thanks for asking.
A prejudicial statement is one that assumes a fact is true about something without any evidence to back up that belief. It is made with the goal of influencing the audience to believe as the speaker of the statement does.
Example: All Republicans will vote for Senator McCain because he is a Republican.
A non-prejudicial statement is one that is made based on facts with no slant to influence the audience one way or the other.
Example: Since I am a Republican, I will vote for Senator McCain.
Note: Democrats should feel free to substitute their candidate of choice in the above examples.
To distinguish between the prejudicial and nonprejudicial use of rhetorical devices, one must understand the nature of rhetorical devices and the context in which they are used. Rhetorical devices are techniques employed by speakers or writers to communicate their message effectively and persuade their audience. While they can be used both in a prejudicial (biased) and nonprejudicial (unbiased) manner, it is important to evaluate their usage within the broader context to discern their intentions.
Here are some steps to help distinguish between prejudicial and nonprejudicial use of rhetorical devices:
1. Understand the intent: Consider the speaker or writer's purpose in using a particular rhetorical device. Are they trying to inform objectively or persuade in a biased manner? Assess whether the intention is to create a fair and balanced argument or to manipulate opinions through prejudice.
2. Analyze the context: Examine the overall context in which the rhetorical device is being utilized. Look for any signs of bias, such as selectively presenting information, using loaded language, or appealing to emotions without logical reasoning. Evaluate whether the device is being used to create a fair and logical argument or to provoke certain prejudices.
3. Assess supporting evidence: Determine whether the presenter provides reliable and credible evidence to support their claims. Prejudicial use of rhetorical devices often relies on anecdotal or biased evidence, while nonprejudicial use employs evidence from reputable sources, data, or logical reasoning.
4. Evaluate language and tone: Pay attention to the language and tone used. Prejudicial uses often employ derogatory or emotionally charged language, aim to demean or stereotype individuals or groups. Nonprejudicial use tends to be objective, respectful, and avoids personal attacks or generalizations.
5. Consider counterarguments: Determine how the presenter addresses counterarguments or differing perspectives. Nonprejudicial use of rhetorical devices typically acknowledges opposing viewpoints and engages in respectful dialogue or debate. Prejudicial use may dismiss counterarguments without proper consideration or resort to ad hominem attacks.
By critically examining these factors, one can better discern whether a rhetorical device is being used in a prejudiced or nonprejudiced manner. Remember, it is essential to evaluate the context, evidence, language, tone, and treatment of counterarguments to make an informed judgment.