philosophy

What fallacies, if any, are present in the following passage? Can you please give reasons for your answer, that is, if you say that a fallacy has been committed, then show where the fallacy occurred, and explain why you think it is a fallacy?
Background: In this passage, William Thorsell is arguing that the waging of war is necessary means of opposing tyrants such as Saddam Hussein. His piece,“The decisive Exercise of Power,” appeared in the Toronto Globe and Mail for December 19, 1999. In the 1930’s the aversion to war in France and the United Kingdom was so pervasive that some pacifists preferred their own subjugation to resistance in the face of violence. Dandies in the best schools developed ….eloquent rationales for inaction and appeasement, even treason, to avoid the contest for power that was so obviously rising in Europe. They rejected the wisdom that good and evil are perpetually in conflict, and that it is only for food men to do nothing for evil men to triumph…..Remarkably, some of the leading nations in the world still don’t appear to “get is” when Saddam Hussein reappears. At root, it seems to be a matter of non-recognition. They just can’t see the man for who he is, just as many people just couldn’t see “Mr. Hitler” for who he was ( the limits of the parallel noted. If you cannot recognize your enemy, you will not defeat him, except by luck of circumstance, and that will rarely do.

I believe that the following fallacies have been made but I know I'm missing one.

The ‘attacking the person’ fallacy has been committed by calling those in the best schools dandies. This is a class related attack and constitutes a fallacy even if no independent evidence is available.

Also, the straw man fallacy has been committed since the author has misrepresented the premises of the opponent’s argument by saying that they developed, “eloquent rationales for inaction and appeasement, even treason, to avoid the contest for power”. He also states that his opponents did not conform to the belief that there is perpetual conflict between good and evil as well as that when good men do nothing, evil men win. The author has exaggerated the premises and has not refuted them adequately. We, as readers, are not given the truth regarding the premises of the opponent’s arguments.

  1. 👍
  2. 👎
  3. 👁
  1. Slippery Slope - Hitler and Saddam parallels "If you cannot recognize your enemy, you will not defeat him...."

    1. 👍
    2. 👎

Respond to this Question

First Name

Your Response

Similar Questions

  1. I Need Help! :'(

    Drag the reasons why Rome was able to expand into the box. a.The maniple was a flexible military unit. b.The Romans stayed isolated from others. c.The Roman soldiers built roads and bridges. d.Rome would give citizenship to loyal

  2. english

    Use the passage to answer the question. Which sentence from the passage best reveals the writer's assumptions? A. That brain may be no larger than a single poppy seed, but the fly is a far more sophisticated creature than you

  3. English

    How can you make an inference about a passage? Select two answers.(1 point) You can test your comprehension of the passage. You can interpret what you learned in the explicit details. You can read different types of writing that

  4. Math

    (Growth of Cells) Suppose that after t hrs, there are p (t) cells present in a culture, where P(t) = 5000e*^2t a) How many cells were present initially? b) Give a differential equation satisfied by P(t) c) When will the population

  1. Grammar tenses

    use the following passage Just outside the cafe', Zach stopped to call a friend. "Hey mike. What are you doing? Do you want to work on that song this afternoon?" asked Zach. "sure," answered Mike. " I was hoping to hear from you.

  2. English

    Paired Passages: Fire from the Rock & The Little Rock Nine 10) How do these two passages differ in the tone of their narrator? A) The narrator of the first passage is frightened. The narrator of the second passage is angry. B) The

  3. reading comprehension

    The title for this passage ("Ghostwritten") is not very good. A good title summarizes the main idea of the passage and lets readers know what to expect should they continue reading. Now, imagine we were to add a SUBTITLE (a lesser

  4. Social Studies

    Use the passage to answer the question. How does this passage from the Ramayana reflect the Hindu value of dharma? A. The passage emphasizes that a person's conduct, or good behavior, is what is most important. B. The passage

  1. Philosophy

    LOGIC and ARGUMENTS – the simple elements Arguments are Composed of THREE PARTS: 1) Premises = basic, commonly accepted reasons – the “why’s,” and “how’s.” 2) Inferences = reasoned “guesses” or based assertions

  2. History

    Which accurately describes exploration events of Sir Francis Drake? drake found a northwest passage to Asia through present-day Canada drake sailed to the new world and founded the colony of Jamestown drake sailed north along the

  3. dragon wings

    read the passage from the text, taken chapter 10, when survivors of the san francisco earthquake gatherd in golden gate park. "at dinner, he even gave Miss Whitlaw-a woman, and a demoness to boot-the seat of honor in his favorite

  4. english

    Both texts deal with racial discrimination. How does the structure of poem help convey this meaning in a way that the prose passage does not? A) The poem conveys meaning through imagery; the prose passage does not. B) The poem

You can view more similar questions or ask a new question.