discrete mathematics with applications

Determine which of the following pairs of statements forms are logically equivalent. Justify your answer using truth tables and include a few words of explanation. Read "t" to be a tautology and "c" to be a contradiction:

26. (p^q)v(p^r)and(pvq)^r

28. (rvp)^((~rv(p^q))^(rvq))and p^q

asked by ovadiel

Respond to this Question

First Name

Your Answer

Similar Questions

  1. Descrete maths

    Show that the following conditional statement is a tautology without using truth tables.[ p ^ ( p ! q )] ! q 8. Without the use of truth tables, determine whether ( : p ^ ( p ! q )) !: q is a tautology. show all your work
  2. Math-truth table, please check my work!

    p -> ~q , p -> q Are these Equivalent statements? This is my try. Please let me know if these truth tables are correct. p -> ~q p q p -> ~q p q p -> q T T T T T T T F T T F F F T F F T F F F T F F T The statements
  3. Philosophy

    First, translate the following statement pair into the symbols of propositional logic (use the letters P and R) (a) We will have a picnic unless it happens to rain (b) We won’t have a picnic only if it happens to rain Second,
  4. Phil103 Informal Logic

    1. Question : "~ P v Q" is best read as Student Answer: Not P and Q INCORRECT It is not the case that P and it is not the case that Q CORRECT It is not the case that P or Q It is not the case that P and Q Instructor Explanation:
  5. phi103

    Mrs. Sue please help! I really need some help on these questions Please! I am having a very tough time. I have tried to answer to the best of my ability, but i am not understanding these. Can someone please help with this? Thank
  6. PHI103

    I really need some help on these questions Please! I am having a very tough time. I have tried to answer to the best of my ability, but i am not understanding these. Can someone please help with this? Thank you. Truth tables can
  7. philosophy (logic)

    I need to know if these two statements are independent: All winners are losers. All losers are winners. I am thinking that they are because I don't see that the truth or falsity of one tells anything about the truth or falsity of
  8. Discrete Mathematics

    b) Determine whether or not the statement “for all integers a, b, c, if a | bc, then a | b or a | c” is false. Justify your answer.
  9. Discrete Mathematics and its Application

    Am not understanding , how to do the truth or Venn diagram to show a statement pv(q^r)is equivalent to (pvq)^(pvr). How can I show the statement is not equivalent to (pvq)^r. I have to explain my answer in truth or Venn diagram,
  10. Logic / Discrete Mathematics

    Show that "¬p Λ q is logically equivalent to p → ¬q" . I'm not sure if the conditional identity is correct, but what I did was I negated the whole second condition and it immediately became equal to the first? Please

More Similar Questions