# discrete mathematics with applications

Determine which of the following pairs of statements forms are logically equivalent. Justify your answer using truth tables and include a few words of explanation. Read "t" to be a tautology and "c" to be a contradiction:

26. (p^q)v(p^r)and(pvq)^r

28. (rvp)^((~rv(p^q))^(rvq))and p^q

First Name

## Similar Questions

1. ### Descrete maths

Show that the following conditional statement is a tautology without using truth tables.[ p ^ ( p ! q )] ! q 8. Without the use of truth tables, determine whether ( : p ^ ( p ! q )) !: q is a tautology. show all your work
2. ### Math-truth table, please check my work!

p -> ~q , p -> q Are these Equivalent statements? This is my try. Please let me know if these truth tables are correct. p -> ~q p q p -> ~q p q p -> q T T T T T T T F T T F F F T F F T F F F T F F T The statements
3. ### Philosophy

First, translate the following statement pair into the symbols of propositional logic (use the letters P and R) (a) We will have a picnic unless it happens to rain (b) We won’t have a picnic only if it happens to rain Second,
4. ### Phil103 Informal Logic

1. Question : "~ P v Q" is best read as Student Answer: Not P and Q INCORRECT It is not the case that P and it is not the case that Q CORRECT It is not the case that P or Q It is not the case that P and Q Instructor Explanation:

6. ### PHI103

I really need some help on these questions Please! I am having a very tough time. I have tried to answer to the best of my ability, but i am not understanding these. Can someone please help with this? Thank you. Truth tables can
7. ### philosophy (logic)

I need to know if these two statements are independent: All winners are losers. All losers are winners. I am thinking that they are because I don't see that the truth or falsity of one tells anything about the truth or falsity of
8. ### Discrete Mathematics

b) Determine whether or not the statement “for all integers a, b, c, if a | bc, then a | b or a | c” is false. Justify your answer.
9. ### Discrete Mathematics and its Application

Am not understanding , how to do the truth or Venn diagram to show a statement pv(q^r)is equivalent to (pvq)^(pvr). How can I show the statement is not equivalent to (pvq)^r. I have to explain my answer in truth or Venn diagram,
10. ### Logic / Discrete Mathematics

Show that "¬p Λ q is logically equivalent to p → ¬q" . I'm not sure if the conditional identity is correct, but what I did was I negated the whole second condition and it immediately became equal to the first? Please

More Similar Questions