ON Abortion
1
Identify the principal issue presented by the source.
2
Identify any examples of bias presented by the author. If none exist, explain how you determined this.
3
Identify any areas that are vague or ambiguous. If none exist, explain how you determined this.
4
Do you find the source credible? Explain your reasoning.
5
Identify and name any rhetorical devices used by the author. If none exist, explain how you determined this.
6
Identify and name any fallacies used by the author. If none exist, explain how you determined this.
7
State one argument made by the author.
8
Identify the premises and conclusion of the argument.
9
Is the author’s argument valid or invalid, sound or unsound, strong or weak? Explain how you determined this.
10
Does the author use moral reasoning? If not, explain how you determined this.
Source 2 Title and Citation:
1
Identify the principal issue presented by the source.
2
Identify any examples of bias presented by the author. If none exist, explain how you determined this.
3
Identify any areas that are vague or ambiguous. If none exist, explain how you determined this.
4
Do you find the source credible? Explain your reasoning.
5
Identify and name any rhetorical devices used by the author. If none exist, explain how you determined this.
6
Identify and name any fallacies used by the author. If none exist, explain how you determined this.
7
State one argument made by the author.
8
Identify the premises and conclusion of the argument.
9
Is the author’s argument valid or invalid, sound or unsound, strong or weak? Explain how you determined this.
10
Does the author use moral reasoning? If not, explain how you determined this.
Source 3 Title and Citation:
1
Identify the principal issue presented by the source.
2
Identify any examples of bias presented by the author. If none exist, explain how you determined this.
3
Identify any areas that are vague or ambiguous. If none exist, explain how you determined this.
4
Do you find the source credible? Explain your reasoning.
5
Identify and name any rhetorical devices used by the author. If none exist, explain how you determined this.
6
Identify and name any fallacies used by the author. If none exist, explain how you determined this.
7
State one argument made by the author.
8
Identify the premises and conclusion of the argument.
9
Is the author’s argument valid or invalid, sound or unsound, strong or weak? Explain how you determined this.
10
Does the author use moral reasoning? If not, explain how you determined this.
Source 4 Title and Citation:
1
Identify the principal issue presented by the source.
2
Identify any examples of bias presented by the author. If none exist, explain how you determined this.
3
Identify any areas that are vague or ambiguous. If none exist, explain how you determined this.
4
Do you find the source credible? Explain your reasoning.
5
Identify and name any rhetorical devices used by the author. If none exist, explain how you determined this.
6
Identify and name any fallacies used by the author. If none exist, explain how you determined this.
7
State one argument made by the author.
8
Identify the premises and conclusion of the argument.
9
Is the author’s argument valid or invalid, sound or unsound, strong or weak? Explain how you determined this.
10
Does the author use moral reasoning? If not, explain how you determined this.
You may need to type the information you're trying to post. Copying and pasting from some sources doesn't work here.
Identify any areas that are vague or ambiguous. If none exist, explain how you determined this.
As an AI text-based bot, I cannot directly access specific sources or provide specific information on them. However, I can guide you on how to analyze and answer the questions about the sources you have provided.
1. Identify the principal issue presented by the source:
To determine the principal issue presented by a source, you need to read the source carefully and identify the main topic or focus of the content. Look for the central argument or idea being presented.
2. Identify any examples of bias presented by the author:
To identify bias, consider the language, tone, or any subjective statements used by the author. Look for any indications of a one-sided or unbalanced perspective that may affect the objectivity of the information.
3. Identify any areas that are vague or ambiguous:
Read the source for any statements or phrases that are unclear or open to interpretation. Look for instances where the author may use language that is not specific or precise, making it difficult to derive a clear meaning.
4. Do you find the source credible? Explain your reasoning:
To assess the credibility of a source, consider factors such as the author's expertise, reputation, and the presence of references or citations. Additionally, evaluate if the source presents well-supported arguments based on evidence and logic.
5. Identify and name any rhetorical devices used by the author:
To identify rhetorical devices, look for persuasive techniques employed by the author to influence the audience. Examples include the use of emotional language, exaggeration, repetition, or appeals to authority.
6. Identify and name any fallacies used by the author:
Fallacies are logical errors or misleading arguments. Examples include ad hominem attacks, straw man arguments, or faulty cause and effect reasoning. Analyze the author's arguments for any flawed or misleading reasoning.
7. State one argument made by the author:
To identify an argument, look for a statement or claim supported by reasons or evidence. It should be a specific position or viewpoint presented by the author.
8. Identify the premises and conclusion of the argument:
A premise is a statement that supports the conclusion of an argument. The conclusion is the author's main claim or point. Identify the supporting statements (premises) that lead to the author's main point (conclusion).
9. Is the author's argument valid or invalid, sound or unsound, strong or weak? Explain how you determined this:
To assess the author's argument, determine if there is a logical connection between the premises and the conclusion. A valid argument has premises that necessarily lead to the conclusion. A sound argument is both valid and based on true premises. Assess the argument's strength based on the evidence, logic, and coherence of the argument.
10. Does the author use moral reasoning? If not, explain how you determined this:
To determine if moral reasoning is used, look for statements that involve ethical principles or considerations. Consider whether the author makes any judgments or evaluations based on moral values and principles.
Remember, these are general guidelines on how to analyze and answer the questions about the sources you have provided.