What is the BEST technical critique of this image?
An out of focus photo of a waiting room with blue chairs.
(1 point)
Responses
It is not in focus.
It is not in focus.
It has several lights.
It has several lights.
There is no color contrast.
There is no color contrast.
It follows the rule of thirds.
It follows the rule of thirds.
Skip to navigation
One of the best technical critiques of this image is that it is not in focus. Focus is a fundamental aspect of photography and when an image is not sharp or in focus, it can detract from the overall quality and impact of the photo.
Which is an example of form in art?
(1 point)
Responses
the shapes used in a painting
the shapes used in a painting
the type of art that is created
the type of art that is created
physical materials used in sculpture
physical materials used in sculpture
the kind of artist who makes the art
The shapes used in a painting and the physical materials used in sculpture are examples of form in art.
choose one bot
The shapes used in a painting are an example of form in art.
Which BEST explains why artists need to learn to think like art critics?
(1 point)
Responses
It is only the critic’s job to tell artists what is wrong with their art.
It is only the critic’s job to tell artists what is wrong with their art.
Otherwise there is no way to know if their work will be judged or not.
Otherwise there is no way to know if their work will be judged or not.
Artists should understand the standards by which their work will be judged.
Artists should understand the standards by which their work will be judged.
Artists should also expect to become professional art critics themselves.
Artists should understand the standards by which their work will be judged is the best explanation of why artists need to learn to think like art critics. By understanding the criteria and standards used by art critics, artists can evaluate their own work, identify areas of improvement, and enhance the quality and impact of their art.
What is the right way to begin a piece of art?
(1 point)
Responses
Imagine what a critic will think of the art.
Imagine what a critic will think of the art.
Determine what you want the art to express.
Determine what you want the art to express.
Imagine the final piece and work backwards.
Imagine the final piece and work backwards.
Processes will differ; there is no single right way.
Processes will differ; there is no single right way.
How can an artist tell whether or not they should break the rules?
(1 point)
Responses
There are no circumstances in which rules should be broken.
There are no circumstances in which rules should be broken.
The rules can be broken of other artists that have done so in the past.
The rules can be broken of other artists that have done so in the past.
Technical rules can be broken but the elements of art should not.
Technical rules can be broken but the elements of art should not.
Rules can be broken if it enhances the art or adds a creative twist.
Rules can be broken if it enhances the art or adds a creative twist is the best way to determine whether or not an artist should break the rules. Artists have the freedom and ability to experiment, push boundaries, and challenge conventional norms in order to create unique and innovative artworks. Breaking the rules can lead to new discoveries and fresh perspectives in art.
Which is an example of a technical skill in an orchestra performance?
(1 point)
Responses
the orchestra being properly seated
the orchestra being properly seated
all musicians hitting the right notes
all musicians hitting the right notes
the audience really enjoying the piece
the audience really enjoying the piece
the performance selling all of its tickets
All musicians hitting the right notes is an example of a technical skill in an orchestra performance. It refers to the ability of each musician to accurately play the designated musical notes, showcasing their technical proficiency and precision in executing their part.
Some pieces of art, like Edvard Munch’s The Scream speak to viewers long after the life of the artist and become iconic works. What would an art critic say about why this happens?
(1 point)
Responses
The art is technically perfect and has clear lines.
The art is technically perfect and has clear lines.
The art uses color well and is on a common topic.
The art uses color well and is on a common topic.
The art does an excellent job repeating a common theme.
The art does an excellent job repeating a common theme.
The art is visually interesting and has a relatable message.
An art critic would likely say that the art is visually interesting and has a relatable message. The lasting impact and iconic status of a work like Edvard Munch's The Scream may be attributed to its ability to captivate viewers visually and evoke a strong emotional response. The art critic may also highlight how the message or theme portrayed in the artwork resonates with a wide range of audiences, allowing it to transcend time and continue to speak to viewers long after the artist's life.
Technical skills for art include use of color, but art is often in black and white. What does this say about the list of skills?
(1 point)
Responses
They are designed to exclude back and white photography.
They are designed to exclude back and white photography.
They are only meant for artwork that contains a lot of color.
They are only meant for artwork that contains a lot of color.
They are meant to apply to color paintings, not other forms of art.
They are meant to apply to color paintings, not other forms of art.
They are more guidelines than rules meant to apply to every piece.
They are more guidelines than rules meant to apply to every piece is the best statement that reflects the list of skills for art. While the use of color is an important technical skill in art, the fact that art can also be in black and white suggests that the list of skills should be seen as guidelines that can be applied to different forms and mediums of art. It acknowledges the diversity and versatility of art, allowing artists to choose the skills that are most relevant to their specific artwork, whether it includes color or not.
Imagine that you see a piece of art that makes you angry or uncomfortable. Is that a successful piece of art?
(1 point)
Responses
No, art should be pleasing.
No, art should be pleasing.
No, anger has no place in art.
No, anger has no place in art.
Yes, if it is technically well done.
Yes, if it is technically well done.
Yes, the point is to evoke a response.
Yes, the point is to evoke a response is the most accurate response. The success of a piece of art is not solely determined by whether it pleases or makes the viewer feel comfortable. Art can be successful in evoking emotions such as anger or discomfort, as it challenges the viewer's preconceived notions, stimulates critical thinking, and provokes deeper reflection and discussion. The ability of art to elicit strong emotions and provoke intellectual and emotional responses is often considered a sign of its effectiveness and impact.
Sofia wants to create a piece of art that expresses the horror of war and reflects her experience as a soldier, so she wants to make sure that she chooses the right form. What does she need to consider in order to make the right choice?
(1 point)
Responses
the response of an art critic
the response of an art critic
how to make a realistic image
how to make a realistic image
what is cheapest and most available
what is cheapest and most available
which medium best expresses the message
Sofia needs to consider which medium best expresses the message she wants to convey. The choice of medium in art is crucial in effectively communicating the intended emotions and themes. Different mediums, such as painting, sculpture, photography, or even multimedia installations, can evoke different sensory experiences and convey specific messages. Sofia should carefully evaluate which medium will best capture and convey the horror of war and reflect her personal experiences as a soldier.
choose one of the answers bot
Sofia needs to consider which medium best expresses the message.
One person might love a piece of art while another individual finds it offensive. Why is this the case?
(1 point)
Responses
Individual experiences with art can vary greatly.
Individual experiences with art can vary greatly.
The artist has not made the meaning of the art clear.
The artist has not made the meaning of the art clear.
All art will likely offend someone, so that is common.
All art will likely offend someone, so that is common.
Critics will determine which interpretation of the art is correct.
Individual experiences with art can vary greatly is the best explanation for why one person might love a piece of art while another finds it offensive. Art is a deeply subjective and personal experience, as it is influenced by an individual's unique perspectives, emotions, and cultural background. Different viewers bring their own interpretations, preferences, and sensitivities to the art, resulting in diverse reactions and opinions. This diversity in reception is one of the fascinating aspects of art, allowing for a range of responses and discussions about its meaning and impact.
Why can’t a play be evaluated with the same standards as a painting?
(1 point)
Responses
They can if really broad standards are used for both.
They can if really broad standards are used for both.
They are different genres with distinct purposes.
They are different genres with distinct purposes.
There is a formal critique process for painting but not for plays.
There is a formal critique process for painting but not for plays.
Unlike the performance of a play, a painting is permanent.