Give them fish they will eat for a day. Teach them to fish they will eat for years.
With regard to low income countries and based on your knowledge and understanding of culture, society and social stratification provide support for or criticism of this statement.
What do you think?
Is it better to give food to hungry people or to show them how to get their own food?
Can a person who's starving learn how to fish or grow their own food?
Is it better to give them food or teach them how to get their own food? Watch out when you are given an "either-or" question!
http://www.members.cox.net/dagershaw/lol/DecisionTrap.html
I hope this helps. Thanks for asking.
if you you give them fish they wont beable to eat when moved out teach them to fish the wont starve
To provide a support or criticism for the statement "Give them fish they will eat for a day. Teach them to fish they will eat for years" in the context of low income countries, it is necessary to consider various factors related to culture, society, and social stratification.
Supporting the statement:
1. Empowerment: Teaching individuals how to fish can empower them to become self-reliant and break free from the cycle of poverty. By acquiring a skill, they can generate income on an ongoing basis, ensuring their sustainability in the long run.
2. Capacity Building: Teaching individuals how to fish involves not just the skill itself but also knowledge about fishing techniques, tools, and market dynamics. This capacity building provides them with a more comprehensive understanding of the industry, increasing their chances of success.
3. Independence: By learning how to fish, individuals can gain autonomy and independence, reducing their reliance on external aid or donations. This can foster a sense of dignity and self-worth, empowering them to contribute to their communities and societies.
Criticism of the statement:
1. Systemic Barriers: In low income countries, there are often underlying structural barriers such as limited resources, inadequate infrastructure, and lack of opportunities that hinder individuals from effectively utilizing their skills. Teaching them to fish without addressing these barriers may not lead to sustainable change.
2. Socioeconomic factors: In some cases, individuals in low income countries may face constraints beyond their control, such as limited access to fishing territories or competition from larger fishing operations. Without addressing these factors, teaching them to fish may not necessarily lead to improved livelihoods.
3. Cultural Considerations: The statement assumes that fishing is a viable and culturally appropriate solution for all communities. However, cultural factors, traditions, or environmental challenges may make fishing unsustainable or undesirable in certain contexts.
In summary, while teaching individuals to fish has its merits in terms of empowerment and capacity building, the effectiveness of this approach in low income countries depends on addressing systemic barriers, socioeconomic factors, and considering cultural considerations. It is crucial to address the root causes of poverty and inequality to ensure long-term sustainable change.