Login or Sign Up
Menu
Ask a New Question

n the text you read, “After the Revolution, the United States owed millions of dollars to individuals and foreign nations. Without the power to tax, Congress had no way to repay these debts. It asked states for money, but the states often refused.”Based on the text above, what can be inferred about the power of the government?

Based on the text, it can be inferred that the government lacked the power to impose taxes and compel the states to contribute money towards repaying the debts.

Which of the following options best describes the Northwest Ordinance? Select all that apply.(4 points)Responses optionsIt outlawed slavery in the newly gained Northwest Territory.It outlawed slavery in the newly gained Northwest Territory.It allowed for slavery in the newly gained Northwest Territory.It allowed for slavery in the newly gained Northwest Territory.It allowed for the Northwest Territory to join existing state boundaries.It allowed for the Northwest Territory to join existing state boundaries.It forbids states from adding the Northwest Territory to it’s existing boundaries.It forbids states from adding the Northwest Territory to it’s existing boundaries.

The correct options are:

- It outlawed slavery in the newly gained Northwest Territory.
- It allowed for the Northwest Territory to join existing state boundaries.
- It forbids states from adding the Northwest Territory to their existing boundaries.

What are the 3 branches of government in the United States?

The three branches of government in the United States are:

1. Legislative Branch: This branch is responsible for making laws and is composed of Congress, which consists of the Senate and the House of Representatives.

2. Executive Branch: This branch is responsible for enforcing laws and is headed by the President, who is assisted by various departments and agencies.

3. Judicial Branch: This branch is responsible for interpreting laws and is composed of the courts, including the Supreme Court, which is the highest court in the country.

The Virginia and New Jersey Plans were combined in order to create the

The Virginia and New Jersey Plans were combined in order to create the Great Compromise or the Connecticut Compromise.

What was one of the major reasons people wanted to change the Articles of Confederation?(1 point)ResponsesThey opposed the Land Ordinance of 1785.They opposed the Land Ordinance of 1785.They didn't want the government to have only 1 branch.They didn't want the government to have only 1 branch.They thought the central government was weak and ineffective.They thought the central government was weak and ineffective.They believed the state government was weak and ineffective.

One of the major reasons people wanted to change the Articles of Confederation was because they thought the central government was weak and ineffective.

Complete the Double Bubble Thinking Map below. Drag & drop the differences and similarities between the Antifederalists and the Federalists. (6 points)Drop targetWanted strong State governmentsDifferent Branches of GovernmentFears a strong Executive (Pres.)Wanted strong National GovernmentAgreed to the Bill of RightsOne person head of the Executive (Pres.)Skip to navigationItem1, Fully Attempted.Item2, Fully Attempted.Item3, Fully Attempted.Item4, Fully Attempted.Item5, Fully Attempted.Item6, Unattempted.Item7, Unattempted.PreviousNext

Apologies, but as a text-based AI, I am unable to perform drag and drop activities. However, I can provide you with a completed Double Bubble Thinking Map that outlines the differences and similarities between the Antifederalists and the Federalists:

Antifederalists (Differences):

- Wanted strong State governments
- Feared a strong Executive (President)
- Did not want a strong National Government
- Did not agree to the Bill of Rights
- One person head of the Executive (President)

Federalists (Differences):

- Wanted strong National Government
- Supported different branches of government
- Did not fear a strong Executive (President)

Both Antifederalists and Federalists (Similarities):

- Agreed to the Bill of Rights (though Antifederalists didn't initially support it)

Please note that this is a general overview and there may be more specific differences and similarities between the two groups.

Complete the Double Bubble Thinking Map below. Drag & drop the differences and similarities between the Antifederalists and the Federalists. (6 points)Drop target 1Fears a strong Executive (Pres.)Drop target 2Wanted strong State governmentsDrop target 3Different Branches of GovernmentDrop target 4Agreed to the Bill of RightsDrop target 5One person head of the Executive (Pres.)Drop target 6Wanted strong National GovernmentSkip to navigationItem1, Fully Attempted.Item2, Fully Attempted.Item3, Fully Attempted.Item4, Fully Attempted.Item5, Fully Attempted.Item6, Fully Attempted.Item7, Unattempted.PreviousNext

I apologize for the confusion. Here is the completed Double Bubble Thinking Map:

Antifederalists (Differences):
1. Fears a strong Executive (Pres.)
2. Wanted strong State governments
3. Different Branches of Government

Federalists (Differences):
3. Wanted strong National Government
5. One person head of the Executive (Pres.)

Antifederalists and Federalists (Similarities):
4. Agreed to the Bill of Rights

Please note that the prompt asked for six points, so you can choose two additional similarities or differences to complete the map.

If you were an American during the time of the Constitutional Convention, would you have considered yourself a Federalist or Antifederalist? Please explain why by identifying 2-3 examples in a 3-4 sentence paragraph. Remember, while writing, to use the RAD

If I were an American during the time of the Constitutional Convention, I would consider myself an Antifederalist. One of the reasons is my belief in the importance of strong state governments, which aligns with the Antifederalist perspective. I would also be concerned about the absence of a strong Bill of Rights, as Antifederalists sought to protect individual liberties. Additionally, I would be wary of placing too much power in the hands of a single executive, contrary to the Antifederalist fear of a strong executive. In summary, my support for strong state power, protection of individual rights, and skepticism towards concentrated executive authority would lead me to identify as an Antifederalist during that era.

If you were an American during the time of the Constitutional Convention, would you have considered yourself a Federalist or Antifederalist? Please explain why by identifying 2-3 examples in a 3-4 sentence paragraph. Remember, while writing, to use the RAD right this as a 8th grader

If I were an American during the time of the Constitutional Convention, I would consider myself a Federalist. One reason is because I believe in having a strong national government to ensure order and unity among the states. For example, a strong national government could better handle issues like trade and defense. Additionally, I would support the idea of different branches of government to provide a system of checks and balances, preventing any one branch from becoming too powerful. Lastly, I would agree to the inclusion of a Bill of Rights to protect individual liberties, as many Federalists like James Madison eventually did. Overall, as a Federalist, I would prioritize a strong national government, separation of powers, and the protection of individual rights.

If you were an American during the time of the Constitutional Convention, would you have considered yourself a Federalist or Antifederalist? Please explain why by identifying 2-3 examples in a 3-4 sentence paragraph. Remember, while writing, to use the RAD write this with no hard words and write this as a 7th grader

If I lived during the Constitutional Convention, I would consider myself an Antifederalist. One reason is because I believe in having strong state governments so that local voices are heard. For example, state governments can understand the needs of their own people better than a central government. Additionally, I would worry about giving too much power to one person, like a president, because it might lead to potential abuse of power. Lastly, I would want a clear Bill of Rights to protect individual freedoms, like freedom of speech and religion. As an Antifederalist, I would prioritize the power of states, individual rights, and limiting the power of a single leader.