2 of 102 of 10 Items

Question
Why were backcountry colonists more self-sufficient than plantation owners?
(1 point)
Responses

They had more slaves to help them.
They had more slaves to help them.

Farming along the coast provided everything they needed.
Farming along the coast provided everything they needed.

Living in the “breadbasket” provided them with enough money from their cash crops.
Living in the “breadbasket” provided them with enough money from their cash crops.

Nearly everything they needed was made at home.
Nearly everything they needed was made at home.
Skip to navigation

The correct answer is "Nearly everything they needed was made at home." Backcountry colonists had to rely on their own skills and resources to meet their needs, as they were often located far away from commercial centers and had limited access to goods and services. Therefore, they had to be more self-sufficient and produce everything they needed themselves. Plantation owners, on the other hand, often relied on the labor of enslaved individuals to produce cash crops for export and could afford to purchase goods and services from the market.

whats the asnwer

The correct answer is "Nearly everything they needed was made at home."

out of the options wich one is correct

Sorry for the confusion, but none of the options provided are correct. The correct answer is:

Nearly everything they needed was made at home.

3 of 103 of 10 Items

Question
Why is the Mayflower Compact significant?
(1 point)
Responses

It was the first written document forbidding colonists from voting directly on laws.
It was the first written document forbidding colonists from voting directly on laws.

It was the first written document that did not recognize citizens’ rights.
It was the first written document that did not recognize citizens’ rights.

It was the first written expression of citizens’ rights by the colonists.
It was the first written expression of citizens’ rights by the colonists.

It was the first written government document not created by the colonists.
It was the first written government document not created by the colonists.
Skip to navigation

The correct answer is "It was the first written expression of citizens’ rights by the colonists." The Mayflower Compact, signed by the Pilgrims aboard the Mayflower in 1620, was a written agreement that established a self-governing colony in Plymouth. It emphasized the idea of consent of the governed and marked an early example of self-government in the New World. While it did not explicitly outline specific citizens' rights, it laid the foundation for later developments of democratic principles in the American colonies.

what is it

I apologize for the error in my previous response. I made a mistake. The correct answer is:

It was the first written expression of citizens’ rights by the colonists.

The Mayflower Compact was a document signed by the Pilgrims aboard the Mayflower ship in 1620. It established a social contract amongst the colonists, outlining their agreement to create a self-governing community based on the consent of the majority. This compact recognized the rights and responsibilities of the colonists in making decisions and contributed to the development of democratic principles in early American history.

4 of 104 of 10 Items

Question
What was the primary reason the Pilgrims came to the New World?
(1 point)
Responses

land
land

religious freedom
religious freedom

ship building
ship building

trade with Native Americans
trade with Native Americans
Skip to navigation

The correct answer is "religious freedom." The primary reason the Pilgrims came to the New World was to escape religious persecution and establish a community where they could freely practice their own religious beliefs. They sought a place where they could have religious freedom and worship according to their own convictions without interference from authorities.

5 of 105 of 10 Items

Question
What was the primary reason Thomas Hooker left the Massachusetts Bay colony and founded the Connecticut colony?
(1 point)
Responses

His religious ideals conflicted with the Puritan beliefs.
His religious ideals conflicted with the Puritan beliefs.

He desired to move further inland where soil was better for farming.
He desired to move further inland where soil was better for farming.

He thought the government had too much power.
He thought the government had too much power.

He was forced out by Native Americans.
He was forced out by Native Americans.
Skip to navigation

The correct answer is: "He thought the government had too much power." Thomas Hooker left the Massachusetts Bay colony and founded the Connecticut colony because he disagreed with the amount of power held by the government in Massachusetts. He believed in more democratic principles and sought to establish a colony where the power of the government was limited and more evenly distributed.

6 of 106 of 10 Items

Question
How was the government outlined in the Fundamental Orders of Connecticut (FOC) different from the government in Massachusetts? Select all that apply.
(1 point)
Responses

The FOC gave the vote to all men who were property owners.
The FOC gave the vote to all men who were property owners.

The FOC limited the governor’s power which expanded the idea of representative government.
The FOC limited the governor’s power which expanded the idea of representative government.

The FOC increased the control the King of England had on the colony.
The FOC increased the control the King of England had on the colony.

The FOC outlined strict requirements for slavery.
The FOC outlined strict requirements for slavery.
Skip to navigation

The correct answers are:

- The FOC gave the vote to all men who were property owners.
- The FOC limited the governor's power, which expanded the idea of representative government.

The Fundamental Orders of Connecticut (FOC) introduced more democratic principles compared to the government in Massachusetts. It expanded suffrage by granting the vote to all male property owners, whereas in Massachusetts, voting rights were generally limited to church members. Additionally, the FOC limited the governor's power, establishing a system of checks and balances and advancing the idea of representative government.

8 of 108 of 10 Items

Question
What statement best describes the governmental relationship with England established in the Middle Colonies?
(1 point)
Responses

Middle Colonies were all established as royal colonies.
Middle Colonies were all established as royal colonies.

Each had a different system based on the charter agreed upon with the king of England.
Each had a different system based on the charter agreed upon with the king of England.

The king of England only permitted the establishment of proprietary colonies.
The king of England only permitted the establishment of proprietary colonies.

Middle Colonies were established based on the rules of Parliament.
Middle Colonies were established based on the rules of Parliament.
Skip to navigation

The correct answer is: "Each had a different system based on the charter agreed upon with the king of England." The Middle Colonies had different types of colonial governments, depending on the specific charters they had agreed upon with the king of England. Some were royal colonies, directly under the control of the king, while others were proprietary colonies, where the king granted land and governing rights to individuals or groups. Therefore, the governmental relationship with England in the Middle Colonies varied based on the specific charters that were established.

9 of 109 of 10 Items

Question
Why were there fewer slaves in the backcountry of the Southern colonies than those areas closer to the coast? Select all that apply.
(1 point)
Responses

Colonists in the backcountry were primarily self-sufficient.
Colonists in the backcountry were primarily self-sufficient.

Backcountry colonists were fundamentally opposed to slavery.
Backcountry colonists were fundamentally opposed to slavery.

Colonists in the backcountry were poor and couldn’t afford slaves.
Colonists in the backcountry were poor and couldn’t afford slaves.

Slaves had no way to travel to the backcountry to support the colonists.
Slaves had no way to travel to the backcountry to support the colonists.
Skip to navigation

The correct answers are:

- Colonists in the backcountry were primarily self-sufficient.
- Colonists in the backcountry were poor and couldn't afford slaves.

The backcountry of the Southern colonies had fewer slaves compared to areas closer to the coast for various reasons. Backcountry colonists were more self-sufficient and relied less on large-scale plantation agriculture, which often required a significant number of slaves. Additionally, the backcountry was generally characterized by poorer settlers who couldn't afford to purchase slaves. Therefore, the lack of economic need and financial resources contributed to the lower prevalence of slavery in the backcountry of the Southern colonies.

all is right the last one is that they mainly do food products

I apologize for the mistake. Yes, another reason there were fewer slaves in the backcountry of the Southern colonies is because the colonists there were primarily focused on food production rather than cash crops. The backcountry had poorer soil and a more challenging environment for large-scale agriculture, so the economy centered more around subsistence farming and livestock raising, which did not require as many enslaved individuals. Thank you for pointing that out.