ead the passage below:"I see democracy as a conversation to be had…It provides us with a framework and rules, but all its machinery are designed to force us into a conversation."Based on the passage, which statement about the amendment process would the author support?(1 point)ResponsesThe ratification process allows governors to reflect public views.The ratification process allows governors to reflect public views.The U.S. Constitution is difficult to amend.The U.S. Constitution is difficult to amend.The ratification process allows the president to reflect public viewsThe ratification process allows the president to reflect public viewsThe U.S. Constitution is easy to amend

The U.S. Constitution is difficult to amend.

A soldier is being charged in a crime on a military based. Which type of law is being applied?(1 point)ResponsesConstitutionalConstitutionalMilitaryMilitaryCivilCivilCriminal

Criminal

Julie is being accused of breaking her contract with a company. The company decides to pursue legal means. What type of law would be applied in this case? (1 point)ResponsesConstitutionalConstitutionalCriminalCriminalCivilCivilJuvenile

Civil

What was the outcome of the Marbury v. Madison case?(1 point)ResponsesJudicial branch has judicial review powersJudicial branch has judicial review powersSenate now has to confirm presidential appointmentsSenate now has to confirm presidential appointmentsPresident is allowed freedom to make appointmentsPresident is allowed freedom to make appointmentsLegislature is now allowed to make laws

Judicial branch has judicial review powers.

Which part of the Constitution sets out the reasons why the Constitution is necessary?(1 point)ResponsesFederalist PapersFederalist PapersArticle 1Article 1Bill of RightsBill of RightsPreamble

Preamble

Read the following passage from the Constitution."All Bills for raising Revenue shall originate in the House of Representatives; but the Senate may propose or concur with Amendments as on other Bills."Which principle of the Constitution is being demonstrated by this passage.(1 point)ResponsesChecks and BalancesChecks and BalancesRule of LawRule of LawSeparation of PowersSeparation of PowersFederalismFederalism

Separation of Powers

Read the following passage from the Constitution."Every Bill which shall have passed the House of Representatives and the Senate, shall, before it become a Law, be presented to the President of the United States; If he approve he shall sign it, but if not he shall return it..."Which principle of the Constitution is being demonstrated by this passage.(1 point)ResponsesPopular Sovereignty Popular Sovereignty Separation of PowersSeparation of PowersChecks and BalancesChecks and BalancesFederalismFederalism

Checks and Balances

Read the passage below:"I see democracy as a conversation to be had…It provides us with a framework and rules, but all its machinery are designed to force us into a conversation."Based on the passage, which statement about the amendment process would the author support?(1 point)

It seems that there is missing information or options for me to provide an accurate response. Can you please provide me with the options or more context for the question?

ead the passage below:"I see democracy as a conversation to be had…It provides us with a framework and rules, but all its machinery are designed to force us into a conversation."Based on the passage, which statement about the amendment process would the author support?(1 point)ResponsesThe ratification process allows governors to reflect public views.The ratification process allows governors to reflect public views.The U.S. Constitution is difficult to amend.The U.S. Constitution is difficult to amend.The ratification process allows the president to reflect public viewsThe ratification process allows the president to reflect public viewsThe U.S. Constitution is easy to amendThe U.S. Constitution is easy to amend

Based on the passage, the statement that the author would support is "The U.S. Constitution is difficult to amend." This aligns with the idea that the author sees democracy as a conversation, suggesting that the process of amending the Constitution should be challenging and require in-depth discussion and consideration.