Compare 364,879; 463,000; and 436,765 using scientific notation. Which number has the least value?(1 point)
3.64879 ×10^5
364,879
4.63 ×10^5
4.36765 ×10^5
Hey just did it for y'all and here's the correct answers :)
1. 3.64879 x 10^5
2. 1.292037 x 10^10
3. 7.6 x 10^-25 > 6.7 x 10^-52
4. 7.6 × 10^−25 , 7.2 × 10^−25, 7.2 × 10^−30, 7 × 10^−30
5. 3.25 × 10^−4, 1.25 × 10^−3, 2.25 × 10^−3, 3.25 × 10^−3
To compare these numbers using scientific notation, we need to look at the magnitude of the number before the ×10.
The numbers in scientific notation are:
3.64879 × 10^5
4.63 × 10^5
4.36765 × 10^5
From these, we can see that 3.64879 × 10^5 is the smallest number, as it has the least magnitude.
can we please get rid of the bot, it is NEVER helpful.
Use scientific notation to compare these numbers: 12,740,876,635; 1,345,763,334; and 12,920,370,000, which has the greatest value?(1 point)
1.2740876635×10^10
12,920,370,000
1.292037×10^10
1.345763334×10^9
To compare these numbers using scientific notation, we need to look at the magnitude of the number before the ×10.
The numbers in scientific notation are:
1.2740876635 × 10^10
1.345763334 × 10^9
1.292037 × 10^10
From these, we can see that 1.292037 × 10^10 is the greatest number, as it has the greatest magnitude.
Compare 7.6 × 10−25 and 6.7 × 10−52. Which statement is true?(1 point)
7.6 × 10^−25 = 6.7 × 10^−52
7.6 × 10^−25 > 6.7 × 10^−52
7.6 × 10^−25 < 6.7 × 10^−52
7.6 × 10^−25 ≤ 6.7 × 10^−52
To compare these numbers in scientific notation, we need to compare their magnitudes.
The numbers are:
7.6 × 10^−25
6.7 × 10^−52
From these, we can see that 7.6 × 10^−25 is greater than 6.7 × 10^−52 because the power of 10 is larger. Therefore, the correct statement is:
7.6 × 10^−25 > 6.7 × 10^−52.
What step did the artist clearly use when drawing this image?
(1 point)
A. Two vanishing points
B. Only orthogonal lines
C. Imagery in the background larger than in the foreground
D. Imagery in the foreground lighter than in the background
Without being able to see the image in question, it is not possible to determine which step the artist clearly used. To accurately assess how the artist drew the image, it would be necessary to analyze the specific techniques and elements employed in the artwork itself.
A pen-and-pencil drawing of a building using two-point perspective is shown. The building is seen from the front, where the right and left sides meet, before the right and left sides angle back to the edge of the frame.
Based on the description provided, the artist clearly used the technique of "A. Two vanishing points" when drawing the image. In two-point perspective drawing, two vanishing points are used to create the illusion of depth and spatial relationships. The converging lines of the building's right and left sides indicate that the artist drew the image using this perspective technique.
A statue and a castle appear in the design of a stage set.
A Stage Set with a Statue and Palace
Because of the use of value change in this image, the artist
(1 point)
was able to make the image have no contrast.
was able to emphasize only one minute area of the drawing.
was able to create the illusion of depth.
was able to create no difference in textures.
Based on the information provided, the correct answer is "C. was able to create the illusion of depth." The use of value change refers to the manipulation of light and dark shades, which can contribute to creating the perception of depth in a two-dimensional artwork. By altering the values, the artist is able to give the appearance of objects receding or advancing in space, giving the artwork a sense of depth.
A landscape has many ruins of ancient buildings.
Using the four steps to critique artwork.
1. Describe the artwork.
2. Analyze the artwork.
3. Interpret the artwork.
4. Judge the artwork.
Which of the following questions would best help you analyze this painting during your critique? (1 point)
What type of scene did the artist create?\
How did the artist use vanishing point(s) and orthogonal lines?
How does the color scheme affect the message?
Did the artist create a successful piece of art?
The best question to help analyze this painting during the critique would be "How did the artist use vanishing point(s) and orthogonal lines?" This question focuses on the technical aspects of the artwork and how the artist utilized the principles of perspective to create depth and structure in the painting. By examining the use of vanishing points and orthogonal lines, it allows for a deeper understanding of the composition and the artist's technical skills.
(An image of a landscape. There is a mountain in the background, with a snow-capped peak. There is a line of clouds dividing the top and bottom of the mountain. The very bottom of the mountain connects to the ground and there are trees along this line. Starting at the bottom of the page, there is a winding dirt road with lines identifying the outer edge. The road disappears as it reaches the bottom of the mountain.)
Which of the following best describes the horizon line in this image? (1 point)
the top of the mountain
the clouds in the center of the mountain
the bottom of the mountain with trees
the edges of the dirt road
Based on the description provided, the best description for the horizon line in this image would be "the bottom of the mountain with trees." The horizon line is typically where the sky meets the land or any other surface, creating a horizontal line across the composition. In this case, the line of trees along the bottom of the mountain would serve as the horizon line, as it demarcates the land from the sky or the mountain from the foreground.
(An entrance to a garden area has a stair case and plant life.)
How would the artist ensure that the background imagery appears to be in the distance?
(1 point)
Use no vanishing point.
Create a value change from the background to foreground.
Make the background imagery as large as the foreground imagery.
Create minimal texture changes on the various surfaces.