CRT 205

The core of the argument against anti-abortion laws is that every woman has a fundamental right to decide what happens to her own body, at least until after the quickening of the fetus. In recent years a few courts have given a sympathetic hearing to this argument, but legal reformers have kept trying to get a clear-cut judicial declaration that women are constitutionally entitled to a freedom of medical choice. Last week a three-judge federal court sitting in New Jersey provided exactly that.

In a 2-1 decision, the court said flatly, "We hold that a woman has a constitutional right of privacy under the Ninth and 14th Amendments to determine for herself whether to bear a child." In the early stages of gestation, the court decided, "a mother's right transcends that of the embryo."

Up to now, New Jersey officials have permitted abortions only if a mother's life or health was threatened. The judges' decision means that all abortion prosecutions in the state will probably be suspended pending an appeal. Until that is settled, however, anyone performing an abortion would still be liable to prosecution if the decision is reversed.

Identify the principal issue presented by the source.
o Identify any examples of bias presented by the author. If none exist, explain how you determined this.
o Identify any areas that are vague or ambiguous. If none exist, explain how you determined this.
o Do you find the source credible? Explain your reasoning.

o Identify and name any rhetorical devices used by the author. If none exist, explain how you determined this.
o Identify and name any fallacies used by the author. If none exist, explain how you determined this.
o State one argument made by the author.
o Identify the premises and conclusion of the argument.
o Is the author’s argument valid or invalid, sound or unsound, strong or weak? Explain how you determined this.
o Does the author use moral reasoning? If not, explain how you determined this.

asked by Shasha' HELP ASAP!
  1. What does CRT 205 stand for? Is this English, law, etc.?

    Sra

    posted by SraJMcGin
  2. Please note that we don't do students' homework for them. Be sure to go back into your textbook or use a good search engine. http://hanlib.sou.edu/searchtools/

    Once YOU have come up with attempted answers to YOUR questions, please re-post and let us know what you think. Then someone here will be happy to comment on your thinking.

    posted by Writeacher

Respond to this Question

First Name

Your Answer

Similar Questions

  1. help asap gov't

    We have held that a liberty interest protected under the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment will be deemed fundamental if it is "implicit in the concept of ordered liberty." Palko v. Connecticut... In construing the
  2. Ethics

    Does the outcome go against the Potentiality Argument and/or the Future like our Argument against abortion? A woman married seven years discovers she has multiple sclerosis. She stops using birth control pills because they
  3. Social Studies

    3. How long is the term of a senator? 2 years 4 years 6 years****** Life 4. What is the core function of the executor branch? To make laws To interpret laws To carry out laws To declare laws unconstitutional********
  4. crt 205

    What is considered a claim versus and argument?
  5. critical thinking

    what kind of fallacy is this statementLetter to the editor: “Andrea Keene’s selective morality is once again showing through in her July 15 letter. This time she expresses her abhorrence of abortion. But how we see only what
  6. crt 205

    Final Project: Comprehensive Argument Analysis
  7. CRT 205

    1.Identify any examples of bias presented by the author. If none exist, explain how you determined this. 2.Identify any areas that are vague or ambiguous. If none exist, explain how you determine this. Abortion Is a Woman's Right
  8. CRT 205- argument

    Is this a correct evaluation of an argument, it's premise and conclusion? Thank you! The author states that “The disability rights movement has a long history of healthy skepticism toward medical professionals, and there's an
  9. CRT/205

    I am having trouble with my home work assignment. My question for you is: I am supposed to outline the premise's of each argument. But I am confused about how to locate the premise? This is my argument: since it is very nature of
  10. CRT 205

    Imagine your child is trying to prove that she did not steal chocolate chip cookies from the cookie jar, so she makes this argument: ―There are no chocolate stains on my hands, so I couldn’t have stolen the cookies.‖

More Similar Questions