What does appropriation have in common with street art?
It often breaks the rules.
It is never considered fine art.
It is often on the side of buildings.
It is usually made with spray paint.
My answer: It often breaks the rules.
Your answer is correct. Appropriation and street art share the characteristic of often breaking the rules or challenging established norms. However, let me explain how I arrived at this conclusion.
Appropriation refers to the practice of borrowing, reusing, or repurposing existing cultural objects, images, or ideas, often without the permission of the original creator. It involves taking something from its original context and using it in a different way, often to convey a new meaning or message.
Street art, on the other hand, typically refers to art created in public spaces, whether it be on the sides of buildings, walls, or other outdoor surfaces. It often includes graffiti, stencils, murals, or other forms of visual expression. Street artists often use spray paint as a medium for their work.
One common characteristic shared by both appropriation and street art is their tendency to break the rules. Both practices challenge traditional notions of art, ownership, and public spaces. Appropriation challenges the idea of originality and copyright, as it involves borrowing and recontextualizing existing works without explicit permission. Similarly, street art often disregards societal rules and regulations by creating art on public surfaces without official authorization.
It is important to note that while appropriation and street art may share this characteristic, they are distinct concepts with their own unique attributes and considerations.