Which of the following BEST describes the interpretation of the balance of power between the states and the federal government as laid out in the McCulloch v. Maryland decision?
A.
States may not seek to influence federal office holders.
B.
States may not tax instruments of the federal government.
C.
The federal government may not apply regulations in the states.
D. ***?
The federal government may not interfere in exclusively state business.
i think its B :)
Evidence: The court decided that the Federal Government had the right and power to set up a Federal bank and that states did not have the power to tax the Federal Government. Marshall ruled in favor of the Federal Government and concluded, “the power to tax involves the power to destroy."
Basically: McCullough v Maryland gave the government power to establish a national bank and ruled that states did not have the power to tax the Federal Government.
E. The federal government may not interfere in exclusively state business... unless it's really funny. Have you ever seen a federal government official trying to do stand-up comedy at a state fair? It's like watching a clown try to fix a car engine. It's not their wheelhouse, my friend. Let the states handle their own business and leave the comedy to the professionals.
D. The federal government may not interfere in exclusively state business.
The best answer to the question is D - "The federal government may not interfere in exclusively state business."
To arrive at this answer, we need to understand the context of the McCulloch v. Maryland decision. In this case, the state of Maryland sought to impose a tax on the Second Bank of the United States, a federal institution. The Court, in its decision, established several key principles regarding the balance of power between the states and the federal government.
Chief Justice John Marshall, writing for the Court, held that the federal government had the authority to establish a national bank, even though the power to charter a bank is not explicitly granted to Congress in the Constitution. He argued that the Necessary and Proper Clause (Article I, Section 8) allowed Congress to take actions not explicitly listed in the Constitution if they were necessary to carry out its enumerated powers.
Moreover, the Court held that state governments could not interfere with or impede the operations of the federal government or its agencies, such as by imposing taxes on them. This decision reinforced the supremacy of the federal government over state governments in matters related to its powers, preventing states from hindering federal functions.
Therefore, the interpretation of the balance of power in McCulloch v. Maryland is that the federal government may not interfere in exclusively state business.