Should Gorbachev be blamed for the current economic woes of Russia? Is a very important question asked today? Why? Because many wonder what would have happened if Gorbachev would have not turned Russia into perestroika, would Russia still be the same as it is today? Many people believe that Gorbachev should be blamed because his political initiatives were great for freedom and democracy, but they were not so great for the economy. It was so horrible that it brought Russia very close to disaster. On the other hand there are people who argue against it saying that Gorbachev was a victim of circumstances that without him Russia could have been worse off then it is today. Both of these positions can be true, but the best position is to blame Gorbachev for the current economic woes of Russia.
I can comment only on your English writing. Perhaps someone else will comment on the content of your paragraph.
-------------------
Should Gorbachev be blamed for the current economic woes of Russia? This is a very important question because many people wonder what would have happened if Gorbachev had not turned Russia into perestroika. Would Russia still be the same as it is today? Many people believe that Gorbachev should be blamed because his political initiatives were great for freedom and democracy, but they were not so great for the economy. It<~~what is "it"? was so horrible that it<~~what is "it"? brought Russia very close to disaster. On the other hand<~~add comma there are people who argue against it saying<~~delete "against it saying" that Gorbachev was a victim of circumstances and that without him Russia could have been worse off then<~~"than" - not "then" it<~~what is "it"? is today. Both of these positions can be true, but the better position is to blame Gorbachev for the current economic woes of Russia.
-----------------
The vague use of "it" several times is confusing. Clarify, please. Work on writing only complete sentences, not fragments or run-ons. Be careful of word choice - there's a huge difference between "then" and "than."
http://grammar.ccc.commnet.edu/grammar/fragments.htm
http://grammar.ccc.commnet.edu/grammar/runons.htm
thanks Writeacher
I apologize for any confusion. It seems like the main question you are asking is whether Gorbachev should be blamed for the current economic woes of Russia. This is indeed an important question because it involves understanding the impact of Gorbachev's policies, specifically perestroika, on Russia's economy and what the alternative outcome could have been.
To answer this question, it is necessary to examine the economic situation in Russia during Gorbachev's time and the subsequent years. One approach to addressing this question is to look at the positive aspects of Gorbachev's political initiatives, such as fostering freedom and democracy. These elements were crucial for the transition towards a more open society in Russia, but it's argued that they did not result in favorable economic outcomes.
On the other hand, some argue that Gorbachev was a product of the circumstances and that without him, Russia could have faced even worse economic conditions. This perspective suggests that blaming Gorbachev entirely might be unfair.
It's important to consider both viewpoints, as they both have some validity. However, to attribute the current economic woes solely to Gorbachev's policies would be an oversimplification.
To further explore this topic and provide a well-rounded answer, consider analyzing the specific economic policies implemented during Gorbachev's time and the subsequent impact they had on Russia's economy. Additionally, researching alternative scenarios and how they might have affected the country's economic trajectory could shed more light on the issue.
Remember, this response is focused on providing guidance on how to approach and analyze the question. The final answer should be based on a thorough examination of the available evidence.