The supreme court decision in gibbons v. Ogden decided that the commerce clause in article 1 of the constitution gives congress the power to regulate interstate trade how was that decision used to increase national power over the states? select all that apply
A. Regulating A National Minimum Wage
B. Regulating Out-of-State College Tuition
C. Passing The No Child Left Behind Law
D. Passing The Civil Rights Act of 1964
E. Passing The Fourteenth Amendment
which of the following are examples of increased centralization of power select all that apply
A. The Commerce Clause
B. The Comity Clause
C. The Due Process Clause
D. The Incorporation Doctrine
E. The Nullification Doctrine
How Does Mandate Increase Centralization?
A. It Suggests That States Match Federal Funds For Grants.
B. It Requires States To Make Changes, Sometimes Without federal funds
C. It Raises Enough Revenue For Common States And federal Goals
D. It Allows Cooperation Between Federal And States Agencies
I think its
1. A&D
2.B&C
and idk 3
1. A,D
2. A,D
3. B
The decision in Gibbons v. Ogden did establish that the Commerce Clause in Article 1 of the Constitution gives Congress the power to regulate interstate trade. This decision was indeed used to increase national power over the states. Let's analyze the options to see which ones apply:
1. Regulating A National Minimum Wage - This is not an example of increased national power over the states. The regulation of minimum wage typically falls under state authority.
2. Regulating Out-of-State College Tuition - This could be an example of increased national power over the states. If Congress were to regulate out-of-state college tuition, it would involve federal interference in a domain that is typically within state control.
3. Passing The No Child Left Behind Law - This is an example of increased national power over the states. The No Child Left Behind Law was enacted by Congress and required states to implement certain education policies to receive federal funding.
4. Passing The Civil Rights Act of 1964 - This is an example of increased national power over the states. The Civil Rights Act of 1964 was passed by Congress to prohibit discrimination based on race, religion, sex, or national origin in various sectors, such as employment and public accommodations.
5. Passing The Fourteenth Amendment - This is an example of increased national power over the states. The Fourteenth Amendment was added to the Constitution and provided protections for individual rights against state infringement.
Based on these explanations, the correct answers are:
- For the first question: options C and D.
- For the second question: options A and D.
Now, let's address the third question: How Does Mandate Increase Centralization?
1. It Suggests That States Match Federal Funds For Grants - This does not necessarily increase centralization. It implies participation but not necessarily an increase in centralization.
2. It Requires States To Make Changes, Sometimes Without Federal Funds - This is an example of increased centralization. When states are mandated to make changes without receiving federal funds, it indicates a level of control and influence over state policies.
3. It Raises Enough Revenue For Common States And Federal Goals - This is not necessarily an example of increased centralization. It may involve cooperation between states and the federal government but does not inherently increase centralization.
4. It Allows Cooperation Between Federal And States Agencies - This is an example of cooperation between federal and state agencies, but cooperation alone does not necessarily increase centralization.
Based on these explanations, the correct answer is option B. It requires states to make changes, sometimes without federal funds, which signifies an increase in centralization.