which of the following was not a sign of the breakdown of royal government in georgia?
a.) sending delegates to the first continental congress
b.) refusal of the commons house to meet when asked by the governor
c.) violent demonstrations
d.) formation of the council of safety **
To determine which of the options was not a sign of the breakdown of royal government in Georgia, let's analyze each option one by one.
a.) Sending delegates to the First Continental Congress: This action would indeed be a sign of the breakdown of royal government. The First Continental Congress was a meeting of delegates from the Thirteen Colonies, including Georgia, in response to the oppressive policies of the British Crown. Choosing delegates to represent the colony indicates a challenge to royal authority.
b.) Refusal of the Commons House to meet when asked by the governor: This also signifies a breakdown of royal government. The Commons House is part of the colonial legislature, and if they refuse to meet as requested by the governor, it suggests a defiance of royal authority and a loss of confidence in the government.
c.) Violent demonstrations: This is another indication of the breakdown of royal government. Violent demonstrations usually occur when the general population is dissatisfied or agitated with the existing system of governance, suggesting a loss of control by the royal government.
d.) Formation of the Council of Safety: This option is the correct answer because the formation of the Council of Safety actually signifies an attempt to establish an alternative governing body separate from royal authority, indicating a breakdown of royal government rather than being a sign of it.
In conclusion, the choice that was not a sign of the breakdown of royal government in Georgia is d.) Formation of the Council of Safety.