Which of the following might a limited government be more likely to do than an unlimited government?

What following?

A limited government is one in which the powers and authority of the government are restricted and regulated by a constitution or other governing document. In contrast, an unlimited government has few or no restrictions on its powers or authority. Based on this distinction, a limited government is more likely to do the following:

1. Protect individual rights: A limited government typically places an emphasis on protecting individual rights and freedoms. It may have specific provisions in its governing document that outline and guarantee certain rights, such as freedom of speech, religion, and the right to a fair trial. This ensures that the government does not infringe upon the rights of its citizens.

2. Encourage private ownership and free market: Limited governments generally support private ownership and a free-market system. They promote economic competition and entrepreneurship, allowing individuals and businesses to freely participate in the market without excessive government interference or control. Limited governments tend to adopt policies that promote economic growth and maintain market stability.

3. Practice fiscal responsibility: Limited governments are often more cautious about their spending and exercise fiscal responsibility. They may have limits on government expenditure, control public debt, and work towards maintaining a balanced budget. This emphasis on financial prudence aims to prevent excessive government borrowing, inflation, and economic instability.

4. Respect the rule of law: Limited governments prioritize the rule of law, which means that all individuals, including government officials, are subject to and accountable for the law. They establish an independent judiciary system that interprets and applies the law without bias or favoritism. By upholding the rule of law, limited governments ensure that their actions are fair and just.

5. Ensure a system of checks and balances: Limited governments often incorporate a system of checks and balances to distribute and limit power among different branches or institutions. This system helps prevent the concentration of power and enables one branch or entity from becoming too dominant. It allows for accountability, transparency, and a more democratic decision-making process.

It is important to note that the extent to which these characteristics are evident in a limited government may vary between countries depending on their specific constitutional arrangements and political circumstances.

A limited government is more likely to do the following compared to an unlimited government:

1. Protect individual rights and freedoms: A limited government is designed to protect the rights and freedoms of its citizens, which includes but is not limited to freedom of speech, religion, assembly, and the right to a fair trial. It establishes a framework of laws and regulations that safeguard these rights, while an unlimited government may have fewer or no protections in place.

2. Foster competition and free market: Limited governments generally support a free market economy, where businesses and individuals can compete fairly and freely. Such governments tend to favor minimal interference in economic activities, allowing businesses to operate without excessive government regulation or intervention. However, an unlimited government often exercises significant control over the economy, leading to restricted competition and limited economic freedom.

3. Decentralize power: Limited governments distribute power among different branches of government, such as the executive, legislative, and judicial branches. This separation of powers helps prevent the concentration of authority in one individual or group, reducing the risk of corruption and abuse of power. On the other hand, an unlimited government often centralizes power in the hands of a single authority, such as an autocrat or dictator.

4. Respect the rule of law: Limited governments are typically bound by a constitution or set of laws that provide a framework for governance. These laws are meant to apply equally to all citizens, including those in positions of power. In contrast, an unlimited government may disregard the rule of law, allowing leaders to act arbitrarily and without accountability.

To determine which of the given options a limited government might be more likely to do, one would need to analyze them in the context of these characteristics.