Which option most accurately assesses the significance of the Louisiana Purchase in relation to the era of westward expansion?
A) It doubled the size of the United States.
B) It eliminated the need to trade with French fur trappers.
C) It fostered the development of industry in the South.
D) It established trade routes to Mexico.
I think the answer is A
Yes, A.
You are correct! The option A accurately assesses the significance of the Louisiana Purchase in relation to the era of westward expansion. Now, let me explain why it is the correct answer and how we can arrive at that conclusion.
The Louisiana Purchase was a crucial event in American history that took place in 1803 when the United States acquired a massive territory from France, doubling the size of the nation. Therefore, by choosing option A, you acknowledge that the Louisiana Purchase indeed expanded the territorial extent of the United States.
Option B states that it eliminated the need to trade with French fur trappers. While the Louisiana Purchase did provide access to new lands rich in fur resources, it did not specifically eliminate the need to trade with French fur trappers, making option B an inaccurate assessment.
Option C suggests that the Louisiana Purchase fostered the development of industry in the South. In reality, the agricultural industry, mainly based on cotton production using slave labor, flourished in the South, but it wasn't directly influenced by the Louisiana Purchase. Thus, option C is not an accurate assessment.
Option D claims that the Louisiana Purchase established trade routes to Mexico. This is incorrect because the Louisiana Purchase primarily dealt with the territory itself, not establishing direct trade routes with Mexico. Hence, option D is not an accurate assessment.
In conclusion, good job selecting option A, as it accurately assesses the significance of the Louisiana Purchase in relation to the era of westward expansion.