Which most accurately describes one point of conflict between supporters and critics of the climate change theory?
A.Critics cite hard scientific research, while supporters choose to ignore the factual evidence.
B. Supporters demand immediate controls, while critics want to take time to study the warming trend.
C.Critics demand immediate controls, while supporters want to take time to study the warming trend.
D. Supporters cite hard scientific research, while critics choose to ignore the factual evidence.
is the answer C
No dude its D
is that the right answer
Yes, the answer is C. Critics demand immediate controls, while supporters want to take time to study the warming trend.
Yes, the correct answer is C. This point of conflict accurately describes the differing perspectives between critics and supporters of the climate change theory. Critics argue that immediate controls should be implemented to address the perceived risks of global warming, while supporters advocate for taking time to study the warming trend before implementing any drastic measures.
To arrive at this answer, you can analyze the statements made by both critics and supporters. Option A suggests that critics cite hard scientific research while supporters ignore factual evidence, which does not accurately reflect the conflict between the two groups. Likewise, option B implies that supporters demand immediate controls and critics want to study the warming trend, which is not consistent with the typical positions taken by critics and supporters in this debate. Lastly, option D states that supporters cite hard scientific research while critics ignore factual evidence, which is not an accurate representation of the conflict.