I have to answer the question: "why are inequalities a more realistic way to model situations than equations" and am having trouble with this.

One reason I thought about is because inequalities are more applicable to real life situations. But other than that, I'm at a loss. Please help.

your response is good, but says basically the same thing that you are being asked, since "realistic" means "real-life."

Still, why are they more applicable to real-life situations?

the only thing I can think of is because inequalities can be like less than or equal to or greater than or equal to where equations are only equal to. In real life, things aren't always equal to exactly something.

Am I along the right track?

To answer the question "why are inequalities a more realistic way to model situations than equations," we need to understand the difference between inequalities and equations and how they relate to real-life situations.

1. Inequalities represent ranges or limits: Inequalities account for variables that can have a range of values rather than a single specific value. Real-life situations often involve constraints, limitations, or uncertainties, which can be accurately reflected through inequalities. For example, when modeling the number of participants in an event, we might use an inequality like "x is greater than or equal to 50" to indicate that the number of participants can be 50 or more.

2. Inequalities account for practical constraints: Inequalities provide a more realistic representation of constraints or restrictions in real-life scenarios. For instance, when determining the pricing strategy for a product, an inequality like "x is less than or equal to $100" would represent a limitation on the price that customers are willing to pay.

3. Inequalities accommodate multiple solutions: Real-life situations often have more than one possible solution or outcome. Inequalities allow for a range of solutions, making them more appropriate for modeling such scenarios. For example, when analyzing profit margins, we might use an inequality like "x is greater than or equal to 20%" to account for different profit percentages that can be considered acceptable.

Overall, inequalities offer a more flexible and practical way to model real-life situations compared to equations because they account for uncertainty, practical constraints, and multiple possible solutions. By embracing the variability and limitations inherent in the real world, inequalities provide a more accurate representation of everyday scenarios.