The great French historian Jules Michelet (1798-1874) sympathized with the French Middle Ages and with the Revolutionary epoch in France, yet he wrote his best work on the despotic French monarchy, which he despised.

That's true.

Jules Michelet, a prominent French historian of the 19th century, had a multifaceted view of French history, particularly the Middle Ages and the Revolutionary epoch. Although he sympathized with both of these periods, he is renowned for his work on the despotic French monarchy, even though he despised it. To understand Michelet's perspective and the reasons behind his work, we need to delve into his personal beliefs, historical context, and the methodology he employed in his writings.

1. Personal beliefs: Michelet had a complex relationship with the French Middle Ages. On one hand, he appreciated its cultural richness, traditions, and spirituality. He saw many positive aspects of medieval society: chivalry, courtly love, and the Gothic architecture that eventually inspired the Renaissance. On the other hand, he acknowledged the darker side of the Middle Ages, such as feudal oppression, religious intolerance, and superstition.

2. Historical context: The French Revolution, which took place from 1789 to 1799, was a period of immense political and social upheaval. It marked a transition from absolute monarchy to a more egalitarian society, driven by principles of liberty, equality, and fraternity. Michelet admired the revolutionary spirit and its ideals, which he saw as a continuation of the progressive movements from the Middle Ages.

3. Methodology: Michelet's approach to history was highly influenced by his engagement with the past. He wasn't just interested in documenting facts but sought to recreate the spirit and emotions of historical events. His writing style incorporated vivid descriptions and dramatic narratives. This approach allowed him to develop a deep understanding of historical periods and to present a nuanced portrayal of events.

Now, combining these aspects, we can better appreciate the rationale behind Michelet's focus on the despotic French monarchy. Despite sympathizing with the French Middle Ages and the Revolutionary period, Michelet saw the monarchy as a major impediment to progress. The absolute power of the monarchy stifled personal freedoms, perpetuated inequalities, and impeded social development. By exploring the despotic monarchy, Michelet aimed to expose its flaws and inspire critical reflections on the limitations of unchecked authority.

In conclusion, Jules Michelet's work on the despotic French monarchy, which he despised, demonstrates his nuanced understanding of French history. To understand this apparent contradiction, we must consider his personal beliefs, historical context, and methodological approach. By delving into these elements, we gain insight into Michelet's vision of history and his desire to analyze and critique different periods of French society.