I am so confused!! Can anyone help me by explaining what it means by international development?
Provide 2 reasons in support and 2 against the position that anthropologists should be involved in applying their knowledge and skills to the goals of international development. And I need to find 2 examples for support and against also.
Thanks
Yes, Savannah/Joy/Karen/Rissa/Joe -- your use of multiple names does show you are confused.
Please use the same name for all of your posts.
Google International Development
Check your text.
Excuse me? Are you this rude to all who ask questions?
My text does not have very much on this.
I did google it already, but I really don't understand what it means, especially to anthropologists: International development or global development is a wide concept concerning level of development on an international scale.
What did I say that you think is rude?
What does your text say about it?
Whoever you are, you've used several different names, one for each question you've posted. Are you suffering from a multiple personality disorder? Ms. Sue is not rude.
What do anthropologists study? Is it not how societies develop? How does that apply to development today, global/international or insular?
International development is similar to modernization in terms of its goals. The process emphasizes economic growth as the most crucial element. According to growth oriented development theory, invests in economic growth will lead to improved human welfare by the trickle down effect.
International development refers to efforts aimed at improving the living conditions and quality of life for people in developing countries. It involves various aspects such as economic growth, poverty reduction, healthcare, education, infrastructure development, environmental sustainability, and social justice. The goal is to address inequalities and create sustainable, long-term improvements.
Reasons in support of anthropologists' involvement in international development:
1. Cultural Understanding: Anthropologists have a unique understanding of the cultural complexities within different societies. This knowledge can help development projects take into account local beliefs, values, and practices, ensuring that interventions are culturally appropriate and effective.
2. Local Engagement: Anthropologists prioritize local participation and community engagement. Their involvement in international development can help ensure that programs are designed and implemented in collaboration with local communities, leading to greater ownership, empowerment, and sustainability.
Examples in support of anthropologists' involvement:
1. Health Programs: Anthropologists can contribute to the design and implementation of health programs in developing countries by considering cultural practices, beliefs, and social structures. For instance, understanding local perceptions of disease and healthcare-seeking behaviors can help tailor interventions for greater acceptability and effectiveness.
2. Education Initiatives: Anthropologists can provide insights into cultural practices, social norms, and educational barriers in specific communities. This knowledge can inform the development of inclusive and culturally relevant education programs, promoting access and quality education for all.
Reasons against anthropologists' involvement in international development:
1. Ethical Concerns: Some argue that anthropologists should focus solely on research and understanding, rather than engaging in interventions. They believe that such involvement may compromise the objectivity and integrity of anthropological research.
2. Power Dynamics: Critics argue that anthropologists' involvement in international development can perpetuate power imbalances between the researcher/expert and the researched/recipient. The imposition of external solutions may undermine local agency and perpetuate dependency on outside assistance.
Examples against anthropologists' involvement:
1. Land Rights: In some cases, anthropologists' involvement in development projects has led to the displacement of indigenous communities due to neglect of their ancestral land rights. This raises questions about the potential negative consequences of anthropological interventions.
2. Cultural Appropriation: Critics argue that the application of anthropological knowledge in development projects can lead to cultural appropriation and the commodification of traditional practices and knowledge, undermining cultural integrity and autonomy.
To find more examples and evidence supporting or opposing these positions, you can consult academic literature, research databases, or relevant reports by organizations working on international development. These sources will provide deeper insights into the topic and present a range of perspectives that can help you understand the complexities involved.