peer review

what are some advantages for both the reviewer and writer of peer reviews


The author of a work that is reviewed by his/her peers gains prestige and legitimacy by having knowledgable people comment and review his work. The peers also can correct any errors in his work.

The reviewers get a chance to add to knowledge and read a new work.

This site has more information about peer reviews.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peer_review



What are some advantages for both the reviewer and the writer of peer reviews. How would you encourage a reluctant peer reviewer?


What are some advantages- for both the reviewer and writer- of peer reviews?


How would you encouge a Reluctant peer Reviews?


What are some advantages- for both the reviewer and writer- of peer reviews?


How would you encouge a Reluctant peer Reviews?


Doo doo...................


If a student is reluctant to do a peer-review, he or she should not get credit for the refusal. Peer-review is an important step in revising and editing any essay or academic paper! Peer-reviewing assists the author in removing unnecessary or unclear information from an essay or academic paper.


what are some advantages for both the reviewer and writer of peer reviews.


What are some advantages—for both the reviewer and writer—of peer reviews? How would you encourage a reluctant peer reviewer?

--




What are some advantages—for both the reviewer and writer—of peer reviews? How would you encourage a reluctant peer reviewer?

--




A advantage of peer review is that it is rare for an individual author or research team to spot every mistake or fault in a complicated piece of work. This is not because deficiencies represent needles in a haystack, but because in a new and perhaps mixed thinker manufactured goods, an opportunity for improvement may stand out only to someone with special skill or experience


how to encourage a reluctant peer reviewer?


how would you encourage a reluctant peer reviewer


What are some
advantages—for both the reviewer and writer—of peer reviews?


what are some advantage for both the reviewer and writer of peer reviewsmeat


What are some
advantages—for both the reviewer and writer—of peer reviews?


What are some advantages-for both the reviewer and writer of peer reviews?

What are some advantages for both the reviewer and writer of peer review?how would you encourage a peer review?

Describe a time when your moral values influenced the way you responded to an issue. What differences did you notice between your logical reasoning process and your moral reasoning process? What were the possible consequences or outcomes of your decision?

Describe a time when your moral values influenced the way you responded to an issue. What differences did you notice between your logical reasoning process and your moral reasoning process? What were the possible consequences or outcomes of your decision?

How will you utilize research techniques in the future?

What are some advantages—for both the reviewer and writer—of peer reviews? How would you encourage a reluctant peer reviewer?



correct the misconceptions of Joe Student, who believes he can workfull-time and pursue his online degree without modifying the study habits he used in high school. Offer suggestions to helb joe succeed as a distance learner.

  1. 👍
  2. 👎
  3. 👁
  1. i hate it

    1. 👍
    2. 👎
  2. I am a big believer in every child has a right to life. A close friend of mine was pregnant,and she already is raising three kids on her own. She called me one day and asked for my opinion,on should she keep the baby or abort the pregnancy.I do not believe in abortion,but I had to look at it from her perspective she already is struggling with three other kids and can't afford another child.I also had to remind her,that she can't fault the child when she could have taken precautions so that it did not happen.My moral value is clashing with the logicalside.My moral says to have the baby and put it up for adoption,because there are a lot of families who wants kids and can not have them.The logical side of me is saying,you can barely take care of the kids you have why bring another child into a bad situation.In the end all I could really tell her was the problem started with her,and the solution will end with her.

    1. 👍
    2. 👎

Respond to this Question

First Name

Your Response

Similar Questions

  1. information Leteracy

    To critically evaluate the qualifications of an author on a topic, carefully consider all of the following except the A. number and type of awards the author has received. B. author's educational background. C. other articles the

  2. Ed Tech please help

    1. A personal narrative is like an autobiography in that it it tells your whole life from birth to present it is a story about something in the author's life written by the author*** it is written in third person it is a story

  3. L A

    I had just finished making a complicated piece of equipment that was to be used for a show opening in Philadelphia called "Fiorello." When the machine arrived they had trouble wiring it, so instead of going off to college that

  4. language

    What is a reader doing when they are delineating an argument?(1 point) analyzing the claim and evidence revising the claim and evidence i think this one recommending the claim and evidence peer reviewing the claim and evidence

  1. Critical Reading

    If someone could please point me in the right direction on these questions? Please. And thanks in advance! 1.One of the reasons a critical reader would not reject the logic and validity of an argument is when the writer has

  2. Language Arts

    What is the definition of author's purpose?(1 point) the author's reason for writing the author's topic of the writing the author's attitude about the topic the author's main idea

  3. english

    Why is it important to evaluate the author's purpose when reading an informational text?(1 point) It can explain what the author’s opinion is on the information presented. It can suggest how the reader should feel about the

  4. English

    Article 1 informs readers about the benefits of hand washing, and Article 2 persuades readers to wash their hands more. Given this information, which method of writing is different between the two articles?(1 point) purpose for

  1. literacy

    To critically evaluate the qualifications of an author on a topic, carefully consider all of the following except the A. number and type of awards the author has received. B. author's age. C. other articles the author has written.

  2. Language Arts

    CHECK MY ANSWERS!! Luke wrote a paper and used another person’s ideas and information. Instead of identifying the author, he wrote the information as if he were presenting his own ideas. Which of the following did Luke do while

  3. Language

    I am a native of North America by Chief Dan Geirge. Man must love fully or he will become the lowest of the animals. It is the power to love that makes him the greatest of them all…for he alone of all animals is capable of love.

  4. Language Arts Examining sources

    Why are primary sources useful for your research? 1. You see one perspective 2. You can get biased facts 3. You can find them easily 4. You get direct information Question 2 Which of the following is an example of a secondary

You can view more similar questions or ask a new question.