The Forer Test of Personality that you took while reading this week's lecture notes appeared, at first glance, to offer insightful results. Later, you discovered that it actually displayed poor
Answers:
a.
Divergent Validity
b.
Convergent Validity
c.
Split-half reliability
d.
Test-retest reliability
C
The correct answer is b. Convergent Validity.
To understand why the Forer Test of Personality displayed poor convergent validity, we need to first understand what convergent validity means. Convergent validity is a measure of how well a psychological test aligns with or correlates with other tests that are designed to measure the same or similar constructs.
In the context of personality tests, convergent validity refers to the extent to which the Forer Test of Personality correlates with other valid and established personality measures. If the Forer Test had good convergent validity, it would show similar results and patterns to other well-regarded personality tests.
However, in this case, the Forer Test of Personality displayed poor convergent validity. This means that its results did not align well with other established personality measures. It suggests that the test did not accurately measure the construct it claimed to measure, or that it lacked the expected correlations with other valid personality tests.
To determine that the Forer Test of Personality had poor convergent validity, the results and patterns of the test were likely compared to those of other recognized personality tests. Researchers may have conducted statistical analyses and correlations to assess the extent to which the Forer Test aligns with other measures.
In summary, poor convergent validity means that the Forer Test of Personality did not show expected correlations or agreement with other established personality measures. This indicates that its results may not be accurate or reliable, and caution should be exercised when interpreting its insights.