Having students compare the styles of art used in Rosie’s Walk to those in Hattie and the Fox encourages __________ development.


A. social and moral

B. personality

C. aesthetic and creative

D. intellectual

C?

I agree.

i really appreciate your help Ms.Sue!

You are welcome, Bev.

To determine the correct answer, let's break down the question and analyze it step by step.

The question is asking about the developmental benefits of having students compare the styles of art used in two books: "Rosie's Walk" and "Hattie and the Fox." The specific aspect of development being addressed is not mentioned, so we need to understand the different types of development that could potentially be encouraged by this activity.

The options provided are:
A. social and moral
B. personality
C. aesthetic and creative
D. intellectual

A. Social and moral development refers to the growth and understanding of social norms, behaviors, and moral principles. While comparing art styles could potentially spark discussions about different perspectives and interpretations, it is not the primary focus of this activity.

B. Personality development refers to the individual's unique traits, qualities, and behaviors. Comparing art styles may not directly impact personality development.

C. Aesthetic and creative development refers to the appreciation of beauty, artistic expression, and the ability to think creatively. Comparing art styles in different books can undoubtedly foster aesthetic and creative development because it encourages children to observe, analyze, and compare the artistic choices made by the authors and illustrators.

D. Intellectual development refers to cognitive growth, critical thinking skills, and the ability to analyze and solve problems. Comparing the art styles of two books requires children to think critically, analyze visual cues, and draw conclusions. Therefore, it can promote intellectual development.

Based on the analysis, the most appropriate answer is D. intellectual development since comparing art styles in two books requires critical thinking and analysis.