"Use evidence from each document to explain which is more accurate and why?"
>there are two articles about the French Revolution, describing the Storming of the Bastille. Both are on alphahistory if you want to see them. One is for a Paris newspaper written by a Frenchman, the other is a letter written by a British ambassador.
I think each is biased, but one is an actual Frenchman recounting it and the other is an official. I personally think the British Ambassador is more accurate. Thoughts?