Part A asks for: A one or two paragraph description of the work's physical structure and any information about the author you may have discovered (ex. magazine title, author, date published).
---Keep in mind that I cannot write a bibliography/works cited. The teacher wants this specific layout and I have absolutely no idea how to write this as a narrative and as the first paragraph of my review.
Part C asks for: My verdict. Did the author achieve the goals set forth?
---My big problem here is that yes, he had goals, but I don't know if he achieved them.
Please help.
Part A. that is relative simple. One paragraph on the technique the author used to write the article. Is it satire; did he use statistics; how is it formatted?--- just a broad analysis of his writing style.
In the second paragraph, write what you found out about the author....a general overview of who he is, what his influences are, what else he has written, anything interesting about his life.
For Part C... 1. Tell what you believe his goals were. 2. Tell how you think he tried to meet those goals.
3. Then the clincher... whether he met those goals are not depends on how YOU felt about the topic after you read the article. So, you are the only person who can say whether he met his goals are not. YOU are the JUDGE.
So you would write: (blank) did or didnot met his goals for these reasons.
Part A:
The work under review is a captivating novel titled [Title of the Work]. It is a masterfully crafted piece of literature that explores the intricate relationships between its characters set against a backdrop of [setting]. The physical structure of the book is a traditional novel format, divided into chapters that allow for a smooth flow of the narrative. The author of the work, [Author's Name], is a renowned literary figure recognized for their ability to create compelling and thought-provoking stories. Unfortunately, due to the limitations of this assignment, I do not have access to specific information about the magazine title, author, or the date of publication.
Part C:
In terms of assessing whether the author achieved their goals, it is crucial to carefully analyze the work's themes, character development, and overall impact. While goals can vary for each author, it is essential to consider whether the author effectively conveyed their intended message, provoked thought, or elicited emotional responses from the readers. As I personally lack sufficient information about the author's specific goals, I am unable to provide a definitive verdict on whether they were achieved. However, a comprehensive analysis of the work's themes, writing style, and reader reception would be instrumental in determining the extent to which the author successfully accomplished their intentions.
Part A: When describing the work's physical structure and any information about the author, you can follow a structured approach to ensure clarity and accuracy. Here's a step-by-step guide:
Step 1: Identify the physical structure of the work. This may include details like the medium (i.e., book, article, painting), format (i.e., print, digital), length, and any distinctive features.
Step 2: Gather information about the author. Look for details such as the author's name, background, qualifications, and notable publications. Search for information from reputable sources, such as biographical websites or the author's official website, if available.
Step 3: Present the information in a concise and coherent manner. Begin with a sentence introducing the work's physical structure, followed by a paragraph providing relevant details about the author. This can include the author's name, notable works, their expertise in the subject matter, and any other relevant background information.
For example, if you were describing a book called "The Great Adventure" written by John Smith, the first paragraph of your review could be:
"The Great Adventure is a captivating novel written by John Smith. It was published in 2018 and is available in both paperback and e-book formats. As an accomplished author, Smith has written numerous acclaimed works in the adventure genre, including 'Journey to the Unknown' and 'Quest for Freedom.' With his deep understanding of the subject matter and storytelling prowess, Smith brings a rich and immersive narrative experience to readers."
Part C: Evaluating whether the author achieved their goals can sometimes be subjective, but there are a few steps you can take to form an informed opinion:
Step 1: Identify the goals set forth by the author. This may involve analyzing the author's statements, preface, or introduction, looking for indications of the intended purpose or message of the work.
Step 2: Read the entire work, paying close attention to whether the author's goals are explicitly stated or if they can be inferred through the content and approach.
Step 3: Collect evidence from the work to support or refute the achievement of the author's goals. Look for elements such as the clarity and effectiveness of the author's communication, the consistency of their arguments or narrative, and the impact or resonance of the work on the intended audience.
Step 4: Formulate your verdict by critically evaluating the author's success in achieving their goals. Provide a well-supported and balanced analysis, considering both the strengths and weaknesses of the work in relation to its stated objectives.
Remember, it's acceptable to have a nuanced opinion and acknowledge that certain aspects might be subjective. Use phrases like "In my opinion" or "From my perspective," to reflect your stance while maintaining objectivity.
By following these steps, you should be able to write a comprehensive description and evaluation of the work's physical structure and the author's goals.