how do you think the framers would respond to the broad interpretation of the preamble intent embraced by many modern political leaders
This is an ambiguous question.
What do you mean by the "broad interpretation"?
What do "many political leaders" think about the Preamble?
What interpretation are you talking about? "many modern political leaders" interpret it how? Then you can tell us what YOU think the framers might think about it.
Preamble:
"We the people of the United States, in order to form a more perfect union, establish justice, insure domestic tranquility, provide for the common defense, promote the general welfare, and secure the blessings of liberty to ourselves and our posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America."
To understand how the framers of the U.S. Constitution would respond to the broad interpretation of the preamble intent embraced by many modern political leaders, we need to examine the context and intent of the framers themselves.
The preamble of the Constitution begins with the famous words, "We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defense, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America."
The framers of the Constitution aimed to establish a framework for a stable and effective government that would protect the rights and freedoms of its citizens. They sought to strike a balance between central authority and individual liberties, recognizing that both were essential for the success of the nation.
The interpretation of the preamble's intent can vary, with some advocating for a narrow focus on specific powers and limitations, while others argue for a broader interpretation that allows for a more active role of the government in promoting the general welfare and addressing societal issues.
If we were to speculate on how the framers might respond to the broad interpretation of the preamble embraced by modern political leaders, it would be important to consider their principles and values. The framers were proponents of limited government, federalism, and individual liberties. They believed in safeguarding the rights of the states and individuals, while also recognizing the need for a functional government.
Given this, it is likely that the framers would have concerns about an overly expansive interpretation of the preamble. They might caution against stretching the powers of the federal government too far, as it could potentially encroach on the rights and powers reserved to the states and individuals. They might emphasize the importance of a system of checks and balances and the separation of powers to prevent any one branch of government from becoming too dominant.
However, it is important to note that the framers' views were diverse, and they did not always agree on all matters. The Constitution itself is purposely written in broad terms to allow for interpretation and adaptability over time. Therefore, the framers themselves might have different viewpoints on the matter.
Ultimately, to truly understand the framers' intent, it is important to study their writings, such as the Federalist Papers and other relevant historical documents, to gain insights into how they envisioned the role of government and the interpretation of the Constitution.