Would the sentence "Time is Money!" be a good opening line for a letter urging a group of international business executives to come to an immediate decision about an investment opportunity?
a.Yes, because then they would realize that a delay could hurt them financially.
b.Yes, because it shows that you have a reason for pushing them on their decision.
c.No, because it emphasizes that you are asking the group to spend money in the first place and their reluctance to do so could be the cause of the delay.
d. No, because people in other countries often take a much more leisurely approach to negotiations; they may want to establish a personal relationship before they decide whether to do business with you or not and that takes time.
My answer is C.
I agree.
To determine the best answer to this question, we should carefully analyze the context and potential implications of the opening line "Time is Money!" in a letter urging international business executives to make an immediate decision about an investment opportunity.
Option A suggests that the line would be effective in conveying the urgency and potential financial consequences of a delay.
Option B highlights that using this line demonstrates that there is a legitimate reason for pushing the executives on their decision.
Option C suggests that the emphasis on money and the notion of asking the group to spend money in the first place might discourage their willingness to make an immediate decision.
Option D indicates that people in other countries may prioritize relationship-building and take a more relaxed approach to negotiations, potentially resulting in a slower decision-making process.
Considering these options, option C seems to be the most reasonable choice. The sentence "Time is Money!" may indeed convey a sense of urgency, but it also emphasizes the financial aspect at the outset, which may not be advantageous when urging a group of international business executives to make an immediate decision. Their reluctance to spend money and establish a relationship could likely lead to a delay.
Therefore, option C, "No, because it emphasizes that you are asking the group to spend money in the first place and their reluctance to do so could be the cause of the delay," appears to be the best answer.