What would have happened if Rutherford shot negative particles instead of positive particles in his gold-foil experiment?
What would have happened if the nucleus in the gold-foil was actually negative, rather than positive, in his experiment?
if this happened then the particles would start to change in a chemical change type and then the beta would start to explode in the form.
I have no idea
hhbhb
If Rutherford had shot negative particles instead of positive particles in his gold-foil experiment, the trajectory of the electrons would have been affected by the repulsion between the negative charges of the particles and the negative charges in the gold foil.
The result would have been that the negative particles would have deflected away from the gold foil, resulting in a diffused pattern on the detector screen instead of the concentrated pattern he observed. This would have indicated that the negative particles experienced repulsion from the negatively charged particles in the gold foil, suggesting a different atomic model.
If the nucleus in the gold-foil was actually negative, rather than positive, in Rutherford's experiment, it would have led to repulsion between the negative charges of the particles in the gold foil and the negative charge of the nucleus. Consequently, when the positive particles were fired, they would have been deflected and scattered in various directions. This would have resulted in a diffuse scattering pattern on the detector screen, instead of the concentrated pattern Rutherford observed.
Therefore, the significance of Rutherford's experiment was that the majority of the particles passed straight through the gold foil, with only a small fraction being deflected. This led to the conclusion that the atom contains a tiny, dense, and positively charged nucleus at its center, which constitutes most of its mass, with the rest of the atom being mostly empty space.