To compose strong, compelling sentences, avoid using
A. clauses as modifiers.
B. forms of the verb to be.
C. dependent clauses.
D. short, simple sentences.
my answer is b.
Yes! :-)
To determine the correct answer, let's break down the question and analyze each option.
A. Clauses as modifiers: This refers to using dependent clauses to modify nouns in a sentence. Examples of this would be phrases like "who is intelligent" or "that ran quickly." While it is generally preferable to use concise and active construction, clauses can be utilized effectively to add detail and complexity to sentences.
B. Forms of the verb to be: This option suggests avoiding forms of the verb "to be" (such as "is," "am," "are," "was," "were," etc.) in sentence construction. While active verbs can enhance sentence strength and clarity, forms of the verb to be are still essential and frequently used in language.
C. Dependent clauses: These are clauses that cannot stand alone as complete sentences and depend on independent clauses for meaning. Dependent clauses enable the expression of complex ideas and relationships between different parts of a sentence. Although it is advisable to use a mix of dependent and independent clauses, it is not recommended to entirely avoid dependent clauses for composing strong and compelling sentences.
D. Short, simple sentences: This option suggests that short, simple sentences should be avoided. However, shorter sentences can be powerful tools for creating impact and conveying ideas clearly. Moreover, varying sentence lengths adds rhythm and flow to writing.
Based on this analysis, option B, which suggests avoiding forms of the verb to be, is not the correct answer. Therefore, your answer of B is incorrect.
The correct answer is D. Short, simple sentences should be avoided to compose strong, compelling sentences. Instead, using a mix of sentence types and structures adds depth, variety, and interest to your writing.