Calculus
I do not understand what this question is asking and how to get the result for it:
"Suppose we have a metal bar of length L0 metres at temperature T0 in degrees Celsius.When the bar is heated or cooled, the length of the bar changes. The amount that the length changes is proportional to the product of the temperature change and the original length of the bar L0. Let á be the proportionality constant of this change where the units for á is measured in m/m◦C (metres per metres degree Celsius). Find an expression for the length L of the metal bar as a function of the temperature T.Draw a sketch of the graph of this function, labelling the point where T = 0."
So far I have figured that you have to have these values of length and temperature proportional to each other so like when length increases, the temperature decreases and as length decreases the temperature increases. But I do not know how to write that and how to come about drawing the graph.

Well, let's see what they have said.
dL = k dT L0
so,
L = k*L0*T + C
Now you can plug in initial conditions or boundary conditions to determine k and Cposted by Steve
Respond to this Question
Similar Questions

Algebra  solving linear equations w/ substitution
The question in the book reads: "Suppose you try to solve a system of linear equations using substitution and get this result. How many solutions does each system have?" 1)x=2 2)y=12 3)6=x 4)8=8 5)7=y 6)5=3 I understand #3 and 
science biology quick question
When applying the process of science, which is tested? A question B a result C an observation D a prediction E a hypothesis I know is D or E can you help me understand why D or E is the better choice? 
Math
In school we're learning to use the quadratic formula. I understand how to use it and what its applications are, but I don't understand why sometime it's okay to simplify and sometimes it's not. For example, I got the result (2 
Math
In school we're learning to use the quadratic formula. I understand how to use it and what its applications are, but I don't understand why sometime it's okay to simplify and sometimes it's not. For example, I got the result (2 
Statistics
Please help me understand this question. Can a hypothesis test yield a statistically significant (say p<=0.05), yet practically meaningless result? Give an example of how this might happen. 
Math
I have a matrix with brackets around [7 6 ][13] [14 6] [8] and i know there are two separate brackets but on this thing you cant just do one big one.. so if you don't understand the equation that was suppose to go into matricies 
Soc. Studies
A boundary was set between Canada and the United States as a result of? A. the Convention of 1818 * B. the Louisiana Purchase C. the Missouri Compromise D. the Monroe Doctrine I think A is the answer but the question is "as a 
science
i do not understand this question and how to anseer it, can someone please help? htt p://i12. tinypic. com/6k8ytdd.jpg the question is in the link because it has a graph that goes along with it that I do not understand, just take 
Science
As a result of rigorous experimentation Question 7 options: more hypotheses may be developed. more questions may be asked. a new biological concept could emerge. entire theories may be modified or discarded. all of these i suppose 
Chemistry
An unknown element reacts with bromine to give bromide, MBr3. If 2.809g of the unknown element gives 27.765grams of MBr3, what is the element? ( give the symbol ) I don't understand the M in the MBr3...can someoen please help me 
toxicology can someone re work this question?
Hi, I have to answer this question "why do we say that metabolism is the factor that most accounts for differences among species in the toxicity of some xenobiotics? I don't understand what the question means I understand all the