i know i'm posting a lot but i just wanna be sure. my answer is b
14. Read the following excerpt from the Supreme Court’s ruling in Stanley v. Georgia.
The makers of our Constitution undertook to secure conditions favorable to the pursuit of happiness . . . . They sought to protect Americans in their beliefs, their thoughts, their emotions and their sensations. They conferred, as against the Government, the right to be let alone—the most comprehensive of rights and the right most valued by civilized man.
–Stanley v. Georgia
In this quotation, the court sought to (1 point)
limit the power of the police to conduct searches.
link the right of privacy to the original intention of the Framers of the Constitution.
deal with the government’s power of eminent domain.
emphasize the government's authority to conduct drunk driving tests, later applied in Schmerber v. California.
I agree, b.
Keep on posting. It's a pleasure helping someone like you who has put a lot of thought into your answers.
In this quotation, the court sought to link the right of privacy to the original intention of the Framers of the Constitution.
To determine the court's intention in this excerpt from the Supreme Court's ruling in Stanley v. Georgia, we need to analyze the text. The excerpt mentions that the makers of the Constitution aimed to secure conditions favorable to the pursuit of happiness and protect Americans in their beliefs, thoughts, emotions, and sensations. It also states that they conferred, as against the Government, the right to be let alone, which is described as the most comprehensive of rights and the right most valued by civilized man.
Based on this information, it can be inferred that the court sought to link the right of privacy to the original intention of the Framers of the Constitution. The passage emphasizes the importance of protecting individual privacy and personal freedoms from government intrusion. Therefore, the correct answer is: link the right of privacy to the original intention of the Framers of the Constitution.