I am six years older than my sister. In five year, her age will be 5/6 of my age then. How old is she today?
sister --- x
you ----- x+6
5 years from now:
sister ---- x+5
you ------x+11
x+5 = (5/6)(x+11)
6x + 30 = 5x + 55
carry on
The theory of PM has both significant similarities, and similar differences, to a contemporary formal theory. Kleene states that "this deduction of mathematics from logic was offered as intuitive axiomatics. The axioms were intended to be believed, or at least to be accepted as plausible hypotheses concerning the world".[7] Indeed, unlike a Formalist theory that manipulates symbols according to rules of grammar, PM introduces the notion of "truth-values", i.e., truth and falsity in the real-world sense, and the "assertion of truth" almost immediately as the fifth and sixth elements in the structure of the theory (PM 1962:4–36):
Variables
Uses of various letters
The fundamental functions of propositions: "the Contradictory Function" symbolised by "~" and the "Logical Sum or Disjunctive Function" symbolised by "∨" being taken as primitive and logical implication defined (the following example also used to illustrate 9. Definition below) as
p ⊃ q .=. ~ p ∨ q Df. (PM 1962:11)
and logical product defined as
p . q .=. ~(~p ∨ ~q) Df. (PM 1962:12)
Equivalence: Logical equivalence, not arithmetic equivalence: "≡" given as a demonstration of how the symbols are used, i.e., "Thus ' p ≡ q ' stands for '( p ⊃ q ) . ( q ⊃ p )'." (PM 1962:7). Notice that to discuss a notation PM identifies a "meta"-notation with "[space] ... [space]":[8]
Logical equivalence appears again as a definition:
p ≡ q .=. ( p ⊃ q ) . ( q ⊃ p ) (PM 1962:12),
Notice the appearance of parentheses. This grammatical usage is not specified and appears sporadically; parentheses do play an important role in symbol strings, however, e.g., the notation "(x)" for the contemporary "∀x".
Truth-values: "The 'Truth-value' of a proposition is truth if it is true, and falsehood if it is false" (this phrase is due to Frege) (PM 1962:7).
Assertion-sign: "'⊦'. p may be read 'it is true that' ... thus '⊦: p .⊃. q ' means 'it is true that p implies q ', whereas '⊦. p .⊃⊦. q ' means ' p is true; therefore q is true'. The first of these does not necessarily involve the truth either of p or of q, while the second involves the truth of both" (PM 1962:92).
Inference: PM 's version of modus ponens. "[If] '⊦. p ' and '⊦ (p ⊃ q)' have occurred, then '⊦ . q ' will occur if it is desired to put it on record. The process of the inference cannot be reduced to symbols. Its sole record is the occurrence of '⊦. q ' [in other words, the symbols on the left disappear or can be erased]" (PM 1962:9).
The Use of Dots
Definitions: These use the "=" sign with "Df" at the right end.
Summary of preceding statements: brief discussion of the primitive ideas "~ p" and "p ∨ q" and "⊦" prefixed to a proposition.
Primitive propositions: the axioms or postulates. This was significantly modified in the 2nd edition.
Propositional functions: The notion of "proposition" was significantly modified in the 2nd edition, including the introduction of "atomic" propositions linked by logical signs to form "molecular" propositions, and the use of substitution of molecular propositions into atomic or molecular propositions to create new expressions.
The range of values and total variation
Ambiguous assertion and the real variable: This and the next two sections were modified or abandoned in the 2nd edition. In particular, the distinction between the concepts defined in sections 15. Definition and the real variable and 16 Propositions connecting real and apparent variables was abandoned in the second edition.
Formal implication and formal equivalence
Identity
Classes and relations
Various descriptive functions of relations
Plural descriptive functions
Unit classes
To solve this problem, let's break it down step by step.
Let's assume that your sister's current age is x. Since you are six years older than her, your current age would be x + 6.
In five years, your sister's age will be x + 5, and your age will be (x + 6) + 5 = x + 11.
According to the second part of the problem, we know that in five years, her age will be 5/6 of your age. In equation form, this can be represented as:
x + 5 = (5/6) * (x + 11)
To solve for x, let's simplify the equation. We can start by multiplying both sides of the equation by 6 to get rid of the fraction:
6 * (x + 5) = 5 * (x + 11)
Simplifying further:
6x + 30 = 5x + 55
Next, let's isolate x by subtracting 5x from both sides of the equation:
6x - 5x + 30 = 5x - 5x + 55
This simplifies to:
x + 30 = 55
Finally, we can solve for x by subtracting 30 from both sides:
x + 30 - 30 = 55 - 30
This gives us:
x = 25
Therefore, your sister is currently 25 years old.