There are two types of miscarriage of justice and after 2003, there was emphasis the conviction of guilty.
Huh?
What is your question?
Yes, that is the question. Based on english law.
Sorry -- but I don't see a question mark.
The two types of miscarriage of justice are known as "Type 1" and "Type 2" errors. Type 1 errors refer to cases where an innocent person is wrongfully convicted, while Type 2 errors refer to cases where a guilty person is wrongfully acquitted.
After 2003, there was an emphasis on the conviction of the guilty, indicating a shift in the criminal justice system's focus towards reducing Type 2 errors. This means that there was a greater effort to ensure that guilty individuals were being held accountable for their actions and that they were not wrongfully escaping punishment.
To understand how this emphasis on the conviction of the guilty came about after 2003, it is important to consider the context of that time period. It might be useful to research any legal reforms or policy changes that occurred during that period, which could have led to this shift in emphasis.
Typically, changes in the criminal justice system's priorities are brought about by various factors, such as public pressure, high-profile cases, or flaws identified in the system. Understanding the specific circumstances that led to this change can help provide a more comprehensive explanation of the emphasis on guilty convictions after 2003.