which of the following would be part of the democratic party platform?
1: cutting taxes for the wealthiest citizens
2: providing for public health care
3: decreasing the size of government
4: cutting funding for educational programs <--
If all counties in Florida had used the same procedure for recounting votes in the 2000 presidential election, then how might that have affected the outcome of Bush v. Gore?
1: The ruling may have changed because the procedure that most of the counties used was unconstitutional
2: The ruling may have changed because the different procedures for recounting votes between counties violated voters' constitutional rights
3: The ruling probably would stay the same because the act of recounting was in and of itself unconstitutional
4: The ruling probably would stay the same because using different procedures for recounting between counties was consistent with the Constitution
My Answers
1:4
2:3
PLEASE!
Im depressed
To determine which option would be part of the Democratic party platform, you can analyze the main principles and policies associated with the Democratic party.
The Democratic party generally supports policies that promote social equality, economic fairness, and government intervention to solve social issues. Based on these principles, option 2: providing for public health care would likely be part of the Democratic party platform. This is because Democrats tend to advocate for accessible healthcare for all citizens, often through government-funded or regulated healthcare programs.
On the other hand, options 1: cutting taxes for the wealthiest citizens and 3: decreasing the size of government typically align more with the Republican party platform. Republicans generally emphasize less government intervention and lower taxes, particularly for top income earners.
Therefore, option 2: providing for public health care is most likely to be part of the Democratic party platform.
Regarding the question about the impact of the same vote counting procedure in the 2000 presidential election, the correct answer would be 2: The ruling may have changed because the different procedures for recounting votes between counties violated voters' constitutional rights. This answer highlights that if all counties in Florida had used the same vote counting procedure, there would have been consistency and fairness in the recounting process, minimizing any potential violation of voters' constitutional rights. The outcome of the Bush v. Gore ruling might have been different if all counties had applied consistent procedures for recounting votes.
Both are wrong.
Please study your book more carefully.